Literature DB >> 16468502

The impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS.

Alice Chung1, Rola Saouaf, Karen Scharre, Edward Phillips.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to detect occult invasive breast cancers with a sensitivity of 97 per cent to 100 per cent. Mammography and ultrasonography does not accurately assess the extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which results in a high reoperation rate. Breast MRI can improve the surgical planning in women with DCIS, improving the adequacy of initial treatment while reducing reoperation. We examined 54 patients with predominantly DCIS (> 50%) who underwent breast MRI from January 2003 to November 2004. MRI altered the surgical management in 14 (26%) patients: unilateral changed to bilateral mastectomy (5); lumpectomy or reexcision to mastectomy (3); unilateral lumpectomy or mastectomy had additional biopsies for lesions detected by MRI in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast (6). There were 8 true-positives and 7 false-positives: sensitivity 86 per cent, positive predictive value 84 per cent. MRI changed the surgical management to more appropriate therapy in 15 per cent of patients avoiding additional surgery, while 11 per cent underwent negative surgical interventions. Breast MRI is a sensitive diagnostic imaging tool in patients with DCIS. However, any suspicious finding should be biopsied before a definitive operation is planned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16468502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Kaoru Itakura; Juan Lessing; Theadora Sakata; Amy Heinzerling; Eline Vriens; Dorota Wisner; Michael Alvarado; Laura Esserman; Cheryl Ewing; Nola Hylton; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Daniel F Chen; Alfred Au; Yunn-Yi Chen; Jessica Leung; Elisabeth R Garwood; Jessica Gibbs; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Reni S Butler; Christine Chen; Reena Vashi; Regina J Hooley; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28

4.  Image guided near-infrared spectroscopy of breast tissue in vivo using boundary element method.

Authors:  Subhadra Srinivasan; Colin M Carpenter; Hamid R Ghadyani; Senate J Taka; Peter A Kaufman; Roberta M Diflorio-Alexander; Wendy A Wells; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Socioeconomic and clinical factors affecting the proportion of breast conserving surgery in Chinese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Dongdong Zhou; Teng Pan; Lixia Cao; Qianxi Yang; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-02

6.  Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Kang; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Hye Mi Gweon; Na Lae Eun; Kyung Hee Ko; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Imaging-assisted large-format breast pathology: program rationale and development in a nonprofit health system in the United States.

Authors:  F Lee Tucker
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.