Literature DB >> 16467663

Comparative effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on oxidative stress, insulin resistance, plasma adiponectin and soluble P-selectin levels in hypertensive patients.

Turgay Celik1, Atila Iyisoy, Hurkan Kursaklioglu, Ejder Kardesoglu, Selim Kilic, Hasan Turhan, M Ilker Yilmaz, Omer Ozcan, Halil Yaman, Ersoy Isik, Francesco Fici.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of nebivolol on oxidative stress, insulin resistance, adiponectin and plasma soluble P-selectin levels in hypertensive patients in comparison with metoprolol.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in grade 1 hypertension according to the European Society of Hypertension and European Society of Cardiology guidelines were enrolled in this prospective, blinded, randomized study. Seventy-two patients completed the study. After baseline assessment, each patient was randomly allocated to a 5 mg daily dose of nebivolol (n = 37, 20 male) or a 100 mg daily dose of metoprolol (n = 35, 18 male) and treated for 6 months. Blood pressure, heart rate, oxidative stress (malonyldialdehyde), homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance, adiponectin and plasma soluble P-selectin levels were measured before and after treatment.
RESULTS: At the end of treatment, nebivolol and metoprolol significantly decreased blood pressure and heart rate, with a more pronounced bradycardic effect of metoprolol. Nebivolol, but not metoprolol, significantly lowered oxidative stress (P = 0.03), the insulin resistance index (P = 0.003) and plasma soluble P-selectin levels (P = 0.008), and increased adiponectin levels (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Nebivolol, in contrast to metoprolol, improved oxidative stress, insulin sensitivity, decreased plasma soluble P-selectin and increased adiponectin levels in hypertensive patients. These beneficial effects of nebivolol may contribute to a reduction in cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16467663     DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000209993.26057.de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  45 in total

1.  Nebivolol improves diastolic dysfunction and myocardial remodeling through reductions in oxidative stress in the Zucker obese rat.

Authors:  Xinli Zhou; Lixin Ma; Javad Habibi; Adam Whaley-Connell; Melvin R Hayden; Roger D Tilmon; Ashley N Brown; Jeong-A Kim; Vincent G Demarco; James R Sowers
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Effects of nebivolol therapy on endothelial functions in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  Fatma Kayaalti; Nihat Kalay; Emrullah Basar; Ertuğrul Mavili; Mustafa Duran; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Ali Dogan; Mehmet Tugrul Inanc; Mehmet Gungor Kaya; Ramazan Topsakal; Abdurrahman Oguzhan
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  New drugs for hypertension: what do they offer?

Authors:  Alan H Gradman; Yoel Vivas
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Beta-blockers: no longer an option for uncomplicated hypertension.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Gayathri Kamalakkannan; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  The vasodilatory beta-blockers.

Authors:  Michala E Pedersen; John R Cockcroft
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Vascular endothelial ageing, heartbeat after heartbeat.

Authors:  Eric Thorin; Nathalie Thorin-Trescases
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Cardiovascular-related healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with hypertension switching from metoprolol to nebivolol.

Authors:  Stephanie Chen; An-Chen Fu; Rahul Jain; Hiangkiat Tan
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-04

8.  Blunted fat oxidation upon submaximal exercise is partially compensated by enhanced glucose metabolism in children, adolescents, and young adults with Barth syndrome.

Authors:  William Todd Cade; Kathryn L Bohnert; Linda R Peterson; Bruce W Patterson; Adam J Bittel; Adewole L Okunade; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Karen Steger-May; Adil Bashir; George G Schweitzer; Shaji K Chacko; Ronald J Wanders; Christina A Pacak; Barry J Byrne; Dominic N Reeds
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 9.  Cardiovascular therapies and associated glucose homeostasis: implications across the dysglycemia continuum.

Authors:  Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Michael A Pacanowski; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Metoprolol compared to carvedilol deteriorates insulin-stimulated endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes - a randomized study.

Authors:  Britt Kveiborg; Thomas S Hermann; Atheline Major-Pedersen; Buris Christiansen; Christian Rask-Madsen; Jakob Raunsø; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Helena Dominguez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.