Literature DB >> 16467649

Prevalence and determinants of isolated clinic hypertension in the Finnish population: the Finn-HOME study.

Teemu J Niiranen1, Antti M Jula, Ilkka M Kantola, Antti Reunanen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies performed in selected hypertensive subjects have reported several possible determinants of isolated clinic hypertension (ICH). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and determinants of ICH in a randomly selected nationwide population.
METHODS: We studied a representative sample of the general adult population (1440 45-74-year-old subjects) in Finland not treated for hypertension. The subjects were drawn from the participants of a multidisciplinary epidemiological survey, the Health 2000 Study. Subjects included in the study underwent a clinical interview, determination of serum lipids and glucose, measurement of clinic and home blood pressure (BP), and psychometric tests for psychological distress, hypochondriasis, depression, and alexithymia. The diagnosis of ICH was based on a clinic BP of 140/90 mmHg or greater and a home BP less than 135/85 mmHg.
RESULTS: The prevalence of ICH in the untreated Finnish adult population was 15.6 and 37.5% among untreated clinic hypertensive individuals. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, ICH was associated with mildly elevated systolic and diastolic BP, lower body mass index (BMI), and non-smoking status. Subjects with ICH represent an intermediate group between the normotensive and sustained hypertensive individuals where cardiovascular risk is concerned (age, BP, diabetes prevalence, lipid profile, and BMI).
CONCLUSION: ICH is a common phenomenon in the general population. Non-smoking individuals with mildly elevated BP and low BMI have a higher risk of ICH. Physicians should disassociate the diagnosis of ICH from any psychosocial disorders, but should remember that patients with ICH have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16467649     DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000209982.21112.bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Characteristics Associated With Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control: A Population-Based Follow-Up Study in Peru.

Authors:  J Alfredo Zavala-Loayza; Catherine Pastorius Benziger; María Kathia Cárdenas; Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco; Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz; Robert H Gilman; William Checkley; J Jaime Miranda
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2016-03

Review 3.  Home monitoring of blood pressure.

Authors:  Barry P McGrath
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

4.  Elevated diastolic, but not systolic, blood pressure measured in the emergency department predicts future development of hypertension in normotensive individuals.

Authors:  Shachaf Shiber-Ofer; Zipora Shohat; Alon Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Blood Pressure Control Has Improved in People with and without Type 2 Diabetes but Remains Suboptimal: A Longitudinal Study Based on the German DIAB-CORE Consortium.

Authors:  Ina-Maria Rückert; Jens Baumert; Michaela Schunk; Rolf Holle; Sabine Schipf; Henry Völzke; Alexander Kluttig; Karin-Halina Greiser; Teresa Tamayo; Wolfgang Rathmann; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.