Literature DB >> 16467422

Task switching as a two-stage decision process.

N Sinha1, J T G Brown, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Saccades represent decisions, and the study of their latency has led to a neurally plausible model of the underlying mechanisms, LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate), that can successfully predict reaction time behavior in simple decision tasks, with fixed instructions. However, if the instructions abruptly change, we have a more complex situation, known as task switching. Psychologists' explanations of the phenomena of task switching have so far tended to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and not intended to relate particularly clearly to existing models of decision making or to likely neural implementations. Here, we investigated task switching using a novel saccadic task: we presented the instructions by stimulus elements identical to those of the task itself, allowing us to compare decisions about instructions with decisions in the actual task. Our results support a relatively simple model consisting of two distinct LATER processes in series: the first detects the instruction, the second implements it.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16467422     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01184.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Contrasting instruction change with response change in task switching.

Authors:  Ian G M Cameron; Masayuki Watanabe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Predicting the timing of wrong decisions with LATER.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; Mia Jing Gao; B C Pearson; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Mechanisms of Water Exchange: The Regulatory Roles of Multiple Interactions in Social Wasps.

Authors:  Devanshu Agrawal; Istvan Karsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Task Allocation of Wasps Governed by Common Stomach: A Model Based on Electric Circuits.

Authors:  Allison Hilbun; Istvan Karsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Integral feedback control is at the core of task allocation and resilience of insect societies.

Authors:  Thomas Schmickl; Istvan Karsai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07

9.  Interfacing sensory input with motor output: does the control architecture converge to a serial process along a single channel?

Authors:  Cornelis van de Kamp; Peter J Gawthrop; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  LATER models of neural decision behavior in choice tasks.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.