Literature DB >> 16467410

Salivary secretions by aphids interacting with proteins of phloem wound responses.

W Fred Tjallingii1.   

Abstract

Successful phloem feeding requires overcoming a number of phloem-related plant properties and reactions. The most important hurdle is formed by the phloem wound responses, such as coagulating proteins in the phloem sieve elements of the plant and in the capillary food canal in the insect's mouth parts, i.e. the stylets. It seems that in order to prevent protein clogging inside a sieve element, ejection of watery saliva plays an important role. This ejection is detected in the electrical penetration graph (EPG) as E1 salivation and always precedes phloem sap ingestion. During this feeding from sieve elements, another regular and concurrent salivation also occurs, the watery E2 salivation. This E2 saliva is added to the ingested sap and, it probably prevents phloem proteins from clogging inside the capillary food canal. Whatever the biochemical mode of action of the inhibition of protein coagulation might be, in some plants aphids do not seem to be able to prevent clogging, which may explain the resistance to aphids in these plants. The relevance of this hypothesis is demonstrated by new experimental results and is related to new EPG results from plants with phloem-located resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16467410     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  98 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana-Aphid Interaction.

Authors:  Joe Louis; Vijay Singh; Jyoti Shah
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Hitching a ride: Vector feeding and virus transmission.

Authors:  Candice A Stafford; Gregory P Walker; Diane E Ullman
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva.

Authors:  Torsten Will; W Fred Tjallingii; Alexandra Thönnessen; Aart J E van Bel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Avoiding effective defenses: strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects.

Authors:  Linda L Walling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  The plant response induced in wheat ears by a combined attack of Sitobion avenae aphids and Fusarium graminearum boosts fungal infection and deoxynivalenol production.

Authors:  Nathalie De Zutter; Kris Audenaert; Maarten Ameye; Marthe De Boevre; Sarah De Saeger; Geert Haesaert; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.663

6.  Enhanced aphid detoxification when confronted by a host with elevated ROS production.

Authors:  Jiaxin Lei; Keyan Zhu-Salzman
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

7.  Induction as well as suppression: How aphid saliva may exert opposite effects on plant defense.

Authors:  Torsten Will; Aart Je van Bel
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-06

8.  Behavioral evidence for local reduction of aphid-induced resistance.

Authors:  Ernesto Prado; W Fred Tjallingii
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Suppression of plant defenses by a Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) salivary effector protein.

Authors:  Dezi A Elzinga; Martin De Vos; Georg Jander
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Tomato pathogenesis-related protein genes are expressed in response to Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Bemisia tabaci biotype B feeding.

Authors:  David P Puthoff; Frances M Holzer; Thomas M Perring; Linda L Walling
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.