Literature DB >> 16466841

Approaches to determining regulatory values for carcinogens with particular reference to bromate.

John Fawell1, Mike Walker.   

Abstract

There are challenges in developing standards for substances that are carcinogenic in laboratory animals. In general, acceptable levels of substances that are shown to act through a mechanism that involves direct genotoxicity are determined by applying a mathematical model to extrapolate the risk at high doses to the risk at low environmental exposures. Most such models assume linearity at the low doses, which is not experimentally verifiable. Levels for substances that act through an indirect mechanism for which there is an experimentally verifiable threshold, such as cytotoxicity and regenerative hyperplasia, are generally determined by applying an uncertainty factor to a no effect level or a benchmark dose. Bromate is a potentially important contaminant in hypochlorite, and also as a consequence of the use of ozone in drinking water treatment. Although it has been used for many years as a flour improver it is known to cause cancers of the kidney, tunica vaginalis testis and thyroid in laboratory rodents. There are species differences in the sensitivity to bromate and differences in the tumours observed. The mechanism by which bromate causes cancer in laboratory animals is uncertain. There is evidence that bromate is a genotoxin but there is also indication that the dose response is not linear at low doses and that bromate may act through an intermediate mechanism. There is also evidence to suggest that bromate may be inactivated by antioxidants in the gastrointestinal tract and blood and so may not reach the sensitive tissues at low doses. Bromate has been considered by WHO, USEPA and Canada with slightly differing outcomes depending on the assumptions made. Because the acceptable levels determined are close to or below the concentrations that can be practically achieved in drinking water, even small differences have become very important. Determining whether it is appropriate to use a linear assumption and which is the most relevant tumour site are important steps in refining the risk assessment to for drinking water disinfection with hypochlorite and ozone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466841     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  6 in total

1.  Potassium bromate as a food additive: a case study of Tunisian breads.

Authors:  Myriam El Ati-Hellal; Radhouene Doggui; Youssef Krifa; Jalila El Ati
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Bottled water safety evaluations in IRAN: determination of bromide and oxyhalides (chlorite, chlorate, bromate) by ion chromatography.

Authors:  Sima Djam; Mostafa Najafi; Seyyed Hamid Ahmadi; Shahram Shoeibi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-22

3.  Manganese porphyrin sensor for the determination of bromate.

Authors:  Shanty Sheen; Theresa Jos; Leena Rajith; Krishnapillai Girish Kumar
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 4.  Electrochemical Sensors for Determination of Bromate in Water and Food Samples-Review.

Authors:  Sheriff A Balogun; Omolola E Fayemi
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  Bromate and trace metal levels in bread loaves from outlets within Ile-Ife Metropolis, Southwestern Nigeria.

Authors:  J A O Oyekunle; A S Adekunle; A O Ogunfowokan; G O Olutona; O B Omolere
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2014-05-22

Review 6.  Participation of the Halogens in Photochemical Reactions in Natural and Treated Waters.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Joseph J Pignatello
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.