Literature DB >> 16466766

Modeling the competitive effect of phosphate, sulfate, silicate, and tungstate anions on the adsorption of molybdate onto goethite.

Nan Xu1, Christos Christodoulatos, Washington Braida.   

Abstract

The mobility of Mo in soils and sediments depends on several factors including soil mineralogy and the presence of other oxyanions that compete with Mo for the adsorbent's retention sites. Batch experiments addressing Mo adsorption onto goethite were conducted with phosphate, sulfate, silicate, and tungstate as competing anions in order to produce competitive two anions adsorption envelopes, as well as competitive two anions adsorption isotherms. Tungstate and phosphate appear to be the strongest competitors of Mo for the adsorption sites of goethite, whereas little competitive effects were observed in the case of silicate and sulfate. Mo adsorption isotherm from a phosphate solution was similar to the one from a tungstate solution. The charge distribution multi-site complexation (CD-MUSIC) model was used to predict competitive adsorption between MoO(4)(2-) and other anions (i.e., phosphate, sulfate, silicate and tungstate) using model parameters obtained from the fitting of single ion adsorption envelopes. CD-MUSIC results strongly agree with the experimental adsorption envelopes of molybdate over the pH range from 3.5 to 10. Furthermore, CD-MUSIC prediction of the molybdate adsorption isotherm show a satisfactory fit of the experimental results. Modeling results suggest that the diprotonated monodentate complexes, FeOW(OH)(5)(-0.5) and FeOMo(OH)(5)(-0.5), were respectively the dominant complexes of adsorbed W and Mo on goethite 110 faces at low pH. The model suggests that Mo and W are retained mainly by the formation of monodentate complexes on the goethite surface. Our results indicate that surface complexation modeling may have applications in predicting competitive adsorption in more complex systems containing multiple competing ions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466766     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

1.  Spatial distribution patterns of molybdenum (Mo) concentrations in potable groundwater in Northern Jordan.

Authors:  Mustafa Al Kuisi; Mohammad Al-Hwaiti; Kholoud Mashal; Abdulkader M Abed
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Sorption specificity and desorption hysteresis of gibberellic acid on ferrihydrite compared to goethite, hematite, montmorillonite, and kaolinite.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Fei Liu; Liang Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Molybdate Recovery by Adsorption onto Silica Matrix and Iron Oxide Based Composites.

Authors:  Florin Matusoiu; Adina Negrea; Mihaela Ciopec; Narcis Duteanu; Petru Negrea; Paula Svera; Catalin Ianasi
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  Facilitated transport of nTiO2-kaolin aggregates by bacteria and phosphate in water-saturated quartz sand.

Authors:  Nan Xu; Zuling Li; Xinxing Huangfu; Xueying Cheng; Christos Christodoulatos; Junchao Qian; Ming Chen; Jianping Chen; Chunming Su; Dengjun Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Identification of Bernalite Transformation and Tridentate Arsenate Complex at Nano-goethite under Effects of Drying, pH and Surface Loading.

Authors:  Junho Han; Hee-Myong Ro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.