Literature DB >> 16466603

Functionality and acceptability of a new electronic insulin injection pen with a memory feature.

Willem J R R Venekamp1, Lisa Kerr, Sherie A Dowsett, Patricia A Johnson, Deborah Wimberley, Chris McKenzie, James Malone, Zvonko Milicevic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The HumaPen Memoir (HPM) is a new reusable insulin injection pen. It possesses an electronic component so that 16 insulin doses are stored in the memory. This study's aim was to evaluate the functionality of the device (i.e., ability to deliver a set dose of insulin), its impact on patient safety, and patient/healthcare professional (HCP) acceptance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 6-10-week (3 visit) multinational, multi-centre, open-label, single-arm outpatient study, participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were assigned to inject either their prandial or basal insulin dose using the HPM and instructed to record all complaints with the study pen or user manual. Investigators submitted a complaint form to the sponsor for each participant complaint, and for adverse events (AEs) potentially related to the study pen. Where a complaint was possibly related to a pen malfunction, the pen was returned to the sponsor for assessment. Participant/HCP acceptance of the HPM was evaluated using questionnaires.
RESULTS: Of the 300 participants (mean age 52 [SD 15] years), 58% were male and 62% had type 2 diabetes. The mean duration of pre-study pen use was 7 years. The average exposure to the HPM was 8.2 (SD 1.6) weeks. Overall, 314 study pens were used (14 were replacements). Functional complaints were reported for 24 devices (7.6%), of which 8 (2.5%) were permanent electronic failures, and 15 (4.8%) were user-related (1 pen not returned for assessment). None of these functional issues resulted in a serious AE. Non-functional complaints were reported for 33 devices (10.5%). There were no pen-related hypoglycemic episodes and 2 pen-related hyperglycemic episodes were reported. The majority of participants (81.4%) preferred the HPM over their pre-study pen. The new insulin pen was generally rated higher than the pre-study pen for pen features and tasks associated with everyday pen use.
CONCLUSIONS: No major functional issue of the HPM resulting in a serious AE was reported in this study. Based on the study results this new insulin pen demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466603     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X80477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  12 in total

1.  Can technology improve adherence to long-term therapies?

Authors:  Gérard Reach
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

2.  No effect of insulin pen with memory function on glycemic control in a patient cohort with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomized open-label study.

Authors:  Thomas Danne; Thomas Forst; Jürgen Deinhard; Ludger Rose; Elisabeth Moennig; Axel Haupt
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

3.  An analysis of "no effect of insulin pen with memory function on glycemic control in a patient cohort with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomized open-label study".

Authors:  Francisco Javier Ampudia-Blasco
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

Review 4.  What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?

Authors:  Barbara J Anderson; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 5.  Practical aspects of insulin pen devices.

Authors:  Teresa L Pearson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Lessons learned during the development of HumaPen memoir, an insulin pen with a memory feature.

Authors:  Stuart D Breslin; Debra A Ignaut; Douglas E Boyd
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

Review 7.  Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Susan M Joy; Emily Little; Nisa M Maruthur; Tanjala S Purnell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Digital Diabetes Management: A Literature Review of Smart Insulin Pens.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Oliver Schnell; Bernhard Gehr; Nanette C Schloot; Sven W Görgens; Christoph Görgen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-11

9.  Psychometric assessment of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ): measuring ease of use and preference with injection pens for human growth hormone.

Authors:  Andreas M Pleil; Miriam Kimel; Julie McCormack; Natasa Rajicic; Judith Hey-Hadavi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.

Authors:  Colin H Ridyard; Dalia M M Dawoud; Lorna V Tuersley; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.