Literature DB >> 1646490

A randomised trial of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (CY 216) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A collaborative European multicentre study.

.   

Abstract

The standard treatment of deep vein thrombosis is given by continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin. This entails hospitalisation, nursing care, immobility and repeated laboratory tests (e.g. activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], platelet count). In addition approximately 10% of patients suffer major haemorrhages. The potential advantages of a low molecular weight heparin (CY 216) given subcutaneously were explored in a randomised trial with blind quantitative evaluation of venograms. The study included 166 patients and both "therapeutic efficacy" and "intention to-treat" analyses showed that subcutaneous CY 216 in fixed doses based only on body weight was more effective on the Arnesen and Marder phlebographic scores than continuous i.v. standard heparin with daily dose adjustment according to results of coagulation tests. There was no increase in the risks of pulmonary embolism, haemorrhage or clot extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1646490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  24 in total

Review 1.  New thrombolytics, anticoagulants, and platelet antagonists: the future of clinical practice.

Authors:  R C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Adjunctive Pharmacologic Treatment: Focus on the Development of Low Molecular Weight Heparins.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Should Replace Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thrombosis and Unstable Angina.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis. An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Leizorovicz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Lindsay Robertson; Lauren E Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Once-daily enoxaparin in the outpatient setting versus unfractionated heparin in hospital for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Beng H Chong; Tim A Brighton; Ross I Baker; Peter Thurlow; Choon H Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Nadroparin calcium. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  R Davis; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Denis Getsios; Ingrid Caro; Judith A O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of the treatment of embolic disorders.

Authors:  D M Lutomski; M Bottorff; K Sangha
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.