Literature DB >> 16464769

Advance directives and the severely demented.

Martin Harvey1.   

Abstract

Should advance directives (ADs) such as living wills be employed to direct the care of the severely demented? In considering this question, I focus primarily on the claims of Rebecca Dresser who objects in principle to the use of ADs in this context. Dresser has persuasively argued that ADs are both theoretically incoherent and ethically dangerous. She proceeds to advocate a Best Interest Standard as the best way for deciding when and how the demented ought to be treated. I put forth a compromise position: both ADs and the Best Interest Standard have roles to play in guiding the care of the severely demented.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16464769     DOI: 10.1080/03605310500499195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  4 in total

1.  Descendants and advance directives.

Authors:  Christopher Buford
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

2.  Advance Directives and the Descendant Argument.

Authors:  Jukka Varelius
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-03

Review 3.  The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Advance care planning in dementia: recommendations for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Ruth Piers; Gwenda Albers; Joni Gilissen; Jan De Lepeleire; Jan Steyaert; Wouter Van Mechelen; Els Steeman; Let Dillen; Paul Vanden Berghe; Lieve Van den Block
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.