Literature DB >> 16464186

The use of conventional antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia in a medicaid population: therapeutic and cost outcomes over 2 years.

J S McCombs1, M Luo, B M Johnstone, L Shi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between drug therapy patterns achieved with conventional antipsychotics and direct healthcare costs over 2 years.
METHODS: Paid claims data from the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program were used to identify 2476 patients with schizophrenia for whom 2 years of data were available. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models were used to estimate the association between lack of antipsychotic drug therapy, delayed therapy, changes in medications, and continuous therapy on healthcare costs over a 2-year period.
RESULTS: Nearly 99% of Medi-Cal patients with schizophrenia were treated with conventional antipsychotics. Patients with schizophrenia consumed nearly $48,000 in direct costs over 2 years. Over 16% of patients did not use any antipsychotic medication for 2 years. Untreated patients used more healthcare resources than treated patients did ($10,833, P = .0422), especially psychiatric hospital care ($8,027, P = .0004). However, treated patients frequently experienced suboptimal drug use patterns. Nearly 33% of treated patients delayed antipsychotic therapy for up to 2 years. Delayed therapy was associated with increased costs of $12,285 (P = .070). Over 56% of patients experienced changes in therapy that were associated with higher total direct costs ($17,644, P < .0001). Finally, only 3.2% of treated patients used an antipsychotic medication consistently for 2 years. However, continuous drug therapy was not associated with lower costs.
CONCLUSION: Suboptimal drug use patterns are common and costly in Medi-Cal patients with schizophrenia who initiated therapy with conventional antipsychotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 16464186     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2000.33004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  7 in total

1.  Does Non-Adherence Increase Treatment Costs in Schizophrenia?

Authors:  Mark Pennington; Paul McCrone
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Comparing treatment persistence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in adult patients with major depressive disorder treated with escitalopram or citalopram.

Authors:  Eric Q Wu; Paul E Greenberg; Rym Ben-Hamadi; Andrew P Yu; Elaine H Yang; M Haim Erder
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2011-03

3.  Mobile phone text message reminders of antipsychotic medication: is it time and who should receive them? A cross-sectional trust-wide survey of psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  Katherine Bogart; Sook Kuan Wong; Christine Lewis; Anthony Akenzua; Daniel Hayes; Athanasios Prountzos; Chike Ify Okocha; Eugenia Kravariti
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Systematic review of the economic aspects of nonadherence to antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tatiana Dilla; Antonio Ciudad; María Alvarez
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Open access to innovative drugs: treatment substitutions or treatment expansion?

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCombs; Parvez Mulani; P Joseph Gibson
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

6.  Use of conventional antipsychotics and the cost of treating schizophrenia.

Authors:  R R Lyu; J S McCombs; B M Johnstone; D N Muse
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Prevalence and Medical Costs of Chronic Diseases Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries.

Authors:  John M Chapel; Matthew D Ritchey; Donglan Zhang; Guijing Wang
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.043

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.