Literature DB >> 16464155

Gel-based versus gel-free proteomics: a review.

Geert Baggerman1, Evy Vierstraete, Arnold De Loof, Liliane Schoofs.   

Abstract

With the sequencing of the genome of over 150 organisms, the field of biology has been revolutionised. Instead of studying one gene or protein at the time, it is now possible to study the effect of physiological or pathological changes on the expression of all genes or proteins in the organism. Proteomics aims at the simultaneous analysis of all proteins expressed by a cell, tissue or organism in a specific physiological condition. Because proteins are the effector molecules in all organisms, it is evident that changes in the physiological condition of an organism will be reflected by changes in protein expression and/or processing. Since the formulation of the concept of proteomics in the mid 90's proteomics has relied heavily on 2 dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) for the separation and visualization of proteins. 2DGE, however, has a number of inherent drawbacks. 2DGE is costly, fairly insensitive to low copy proteins and cannot be used for the entire proteome. Therefore, over the years, several gel-free proteomics techniques have been developed to either fill the gaps left by 2DGE or to entirely abolish the gel based techniques. This review summarizes the most important gel-free and gel-based proteomics techniques and compares their advantages and drawbacks.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16464155     DOI: 10.2174/138620705774962490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen        ISSN: 1386-2073            Impact factor:   1.339


  24 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics in radiation research: present status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Omid Azimzadeh; Michael J Atkinson; Soile Tapio
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A gel-free proteomic analysis of Taenia solium and Taenia crassiceps cysticerci vesicular extracts.

Authors:  Giovani Carlo Veríssimo da Costa; Regina Helena Saramago Peralta; Dário Eluan Kalume; Ana Larissa Gama Martins Alves; José Mauro Peralta
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Mohieddin Jafari; Vincent Primo; Gary B Smejkal; Eugene V Moskovets; Winston P Kuo; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Proteomic Analysis Reveals Branch-specific Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response by Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay.

Authors:  Jana Sieber; Christian Hauer; Madhuri Bhuvanagiri; Stefan Leicht; Jeroen Krijgsveld; Gabriele Neu-Yilik; Matthias W Hentze; Andreas E Kulozik
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Skeletal muscle proteomics: current approaches, technical challenges and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Kay Ohlendieck
Journal:  Skelet Muscle       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.912

6.  Proteomic Profiling of Mitochondrial Enzymes during Skeletal Muscle Aging.

Authors:  Lisa Staunton; Kathleen O'Connell; Kay Ohlendieck
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-03-07

Review 7.  Middle-down approach: a choice to sequence and characterize proteins/proteomes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  P Boomathi Pandeswari; Varatharajan Sabareesh
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  Plant Microbe Interactions in Post Genomic Era: Perspectives and Applications.

Authors:  Jahangir Imam; Puneet K Singh; Pratyoosh Shukla
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Tachyplesin I Targets in U251 Gliomaspheres.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Jianguo Dai; Yongjun Tang; Lulu Li; Gang Jin
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Proteomics: a biotechnology tool for crop improvement.

Authors:  Moustafa Eldakak; Sanaa I M Milad; Ali I Nawar; Jai S Rohila
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.