Literature DB >> 16463243

[Determinants of hospital admission--investigation by case vignettes].

B-P Robra1, H Kania, O Kuss, K Schönfisch, E Swart.   

Abstract

Unexplained differences in the density of in-patient management in one federal state in Germany led to a regional survey of physicians in independent and hospital practice, which aimed to describe more precisely the determinants of referral and admission behaviour. Brief typical case descriptions (vignettes) were designed, as an instrument of data collection, dealing with two examples of management problems: upper and lower abdominal pain. The urgency of inpatient treatment was ranked using clinical scores and guidelines. Social characteristics for the patient (age, gender, social situation, preference for/against hospitalisation, day of the week on which the patient presented) were randomly assigned to the case vignettes. Each physician was asked by mail to decide on the management of 10 upper and 10 lower abdominal vignettes each. The physicians were also asked to provide additional information on the characteristics of their practice or hospital. The data were analysed using multivariate hierarchical models. A 28 % response rate meant that vignettes were available from 455 general practitioners and internal medicine specialists in independent practice, as well as 261 hospital surgeons and internal medicine specialists, together with responses from 31 physicians from the medical service of the German statutory health insurance (MDK). 7376 upper abdominal and 7335 lower abdominal vignettes were analysed. Admission rates reflected the graded severity of the symptoms built into the vignettes. Hospital physicians wanted to admit the vignette patients much more frequently than physicians in independent practice wished to refer them. Older patients, independent of symptoms, were more frequently referred or admitted than younger patients. In the case of acute symptoms it is the day of the week when the patient consulted the physician and in the case of elective surgery the patient's preference that are important for hospitalisation. The results show that medical decisions on case management are made using reasonable problem-specific preferences. The probability of actually instigating admission was, other things being equal, much higher in hospital physicians than in office-based physicians. As an instrument of comparative research into medical care, case vignettes have practical advantages in relation to medical audits and standardised patients. They can also be used for teaching, examining, documenting and quality assurance purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16463243     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  7 in total

1.  Do physicians attend to base rates? Prevalence data and statistical discrimination in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Karen E Lutfey; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Disparities in physicians' interpretations of heart disease symptoms by patient gender: results of a video vignette factorial experiment.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Carol L Link; Karen L Lutfey; Lisa D Marceau; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Is certainty more important than diagnosis for understanding race and gender disparities?: an experiment using coronary heart disease and depression case vignettes.

Authors:  Karen E Lutfey; Carol L Link; Richard W Grant; Lisa D Marceau; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Diagnostic certainty as a source of medical practice variation in coronary heart disease: results from a cross-national experiment of clinical decision making.

Authors:  Karen E Lutfey; Carol L Link; Lisa D Marceau; Richard W Grant; Ann Adams; Sara Arber; Johannes Siegrist; Markus Bönte; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Decision-Making in Implantology-A Cross-Sectional Vignette-Based Study to Determine Clinical Treatment Routines for the Edentulous Atrophic Mandible.

Authors:  Michael Korsch; Winfried Walther; Bernt-Peter Robra; Aynur Sahin; Matthias Hannig; Andreas Bartols
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Case vignettes based on EQ-5D to elicit stated preferences for health services utilization from the insurees' perspective.

Authors:  Julia Eckert; Marcel Lichters; Silke Piedmont; Bodo Vogt; Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  How do specialist surgeons treat the atrophic tooth gap? A vignette-based study among maxillofacial and oral surgeons.

Authors:  Michael Korsch; Winfried Walther; Bernt-Peter Robra; Aynur Sahin; Matthias Hannig; Andreas Bartols
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.