Literature DB >> 16463196

Use of a patient information leaflet to influence patient decisions regarding mode of administration of NSAID medications in case of acute low back pain.

Thomas Rosemann1, Stefanie Joos, Thorsten Koerner, Marc Heiderhoff, Gunter Laux, Joachim Szecsenyi.   

Abstract

Despite dissuasive recommendations, intramuscular (i.m.) injections of NSAIDS are still a widespread treatment of acute pain in General Practice as well as among orthopaedic physicians. Most physicians argue that patients who are used to receive NSAIDS i.m. would insist on this application mode while being convinced of its therapeutic superiority for pain relief. Therefore, the aim of the study was to find out if patients' decision can be influenced towards an oral application by receiving a simple information leaflet. An information leaflet, providing information about the risks of NSAIDS particularly in case of i.m. application was provided to 161 patients with acute low back pain. Decision in favour or against i.m. application of NSAIDS was documented. Severity of disease was assessed by the Roland Morrison pain questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) at the first visit and again 3-5 days later. From May to December 2004, 161 patients, visiting their GP (13 practices) with acute pain and demanding an injection were included in the study. After reading the information leaflet, 139 of the 161 (86.3%) patients decided for an oral application instead of receiving an injection of NSAIDS as in the past. This effect was statistically significant (P</=0.01). Of the initial 161 patients, 156 could be re-evaluated and no significant differences in the VAS and the Roland Morris Score between the patients with oral and i.m. application mode could be found. Only 2 patients of the 139 who decided for oral application indicated that they would opt for an i.m. injection next time. Our study demonstrates that patients' decision can be influenced even in case of severe pain by providing adequate information on a short information leaflet. The results should help to reduce physicians' fear of losing patients when not following their demand for i.m. injections and therefore enable a safer pain treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16463196     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0068-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Pyomyositis or "injectiositis"--Staphylococcus aureus multiple abscesses following intramuscular injections.

Authors:  Pnina Rotman-Pikielny; Yair Levy; Ana Eyal; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.892

2.  [Diagnosis in everyday practice].

Authors:  R N BRAUN
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1956-08-03       Impact factor: 0.628

3.  [Learning from the experiences of an arbitration unit for medical liability questions].

Authors:  K D Scheppokat
Journal:  Ther Umsch       Date:  2005-03

4.  Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet.

Authors:  John Macfarlane; William Holmes; Philip Gard; David Thornhill; Rosamund Macfarlane; Richard Hubbard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

Review 5.  Necrotizing fasciitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae after intramuscular injection of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: report of 2 cases and review.

Authors:  S Frick; A Cerny
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-08-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  [Medical errors and iatrogenic injury--results of 173 Schlichtungsstellen proceedings in general practice].

Authors:  K D Scheppokat
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2004-09

7.  Hypoxic brain damage after intramuscular self-injection of diclofenac for acute back pain.

Authors:  W R Schäbitz; C Berger; M Knauth; H M Meinck; T Steiner
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; A Kim Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  [Intramuscular application of diclofenac--case report and critical consideration of a therapeutic measure].

Authors:  H Grass; A Schuff; C Bertram; M A Rothschild
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Office visits and analgesic prescriptions for musculoskeletal pain in US: 1980 vs. 2000.

Authors:  Margaret A Caudill-Slosberg; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diffusion of new medication across different income groups under a universal health insurance program: an example involving newly enlisted nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for elderly osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Pen-Jen Wang; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Cheng-Hua Lee; Christy Pu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  [Evidence and consensus based Austrian guidelines for management of acute and chronic nonspecific backache].

Authors: 
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Study of the information delivery by general practitioners and rheumatologists to patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Yves Henrotin; Dominique Moyse; Thierry Bazin; Christine Cedraschi; Bernard Duplan; Bernard Duquesnoy; Francoise Laroche; Jean-Pierre Valat; Marc Marty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Concordance of patient beliefs and expectations regarding the management of low back pain with guideline recommendations - a cross-sectional study in Germany.

Authors:  Simone Kiel; Christina Raus; Elizabeth Sierocinski; Peggy Knauthe; Jean-François Chenot
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Clinician education unlikely effective for guideline-adherent medication prescription in low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Scott D Tagliaferri; Paul Buntine; Tobias Saueressig; Kate Sadler; Christy Ko; Clint T Miller; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.