OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the empirical or DSM-oriented scales of the Youth Self-Report (YSR) can be used to screen for DSM psychiatric disorders among incarcerated boys. DSM-oriented scales have recently been developed by Achenbach to enhance comparability of YSR results with DSM diagnostic categories. METHOD: A representative sample (N = 196) of incarcerated boys aged 12-18 was assessed with the child version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-C) to diagnose DSM psychiatric disorders, and with the Youth Self-Report (YSR). RESULTS: Only 22% had YSR total problem scores in the clinical range, whereas 90 % met criteria of at least one DSM/DISC-C psychiatric disorder. Weak associations between both empirical and DSM-oriented YSR scale scores and DSM/DISC-C diagnoses were found. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the empirical nor the DSM-oriented YSR scales adequately screen for DSM/DISC-C psychiatric disorders among incarcerated boys. The use of the YSR and the DISC-C to assess DSM constructs results in, at least partially, different diagnostic information.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the empirical or DSM-oriented scales of the Youth Self-Report (YSR) can be used to screen for DSM psychiatric disorders among incarcerated boys. DSM-oriented scales have recently been developed by Achenbach to enhance comparability of YSR results with DSM diagnostic categories. METHOD: A representative sample (N = 196) of incarcerated boys aged 12-18 was assessed with the child version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-C) to diagnose DSM psychiatric disorders, and with the Youth Self-Report (YSR). RESULTS: Only 22% had YSR total problem scores in the clinical range, whereas 90 % met criteria of at least one DSM/DISC-C psychiatric disorder. Weak associations between both empirical and DSM-oriented YSR scale scores and DSM/DISC-C diagnoses were found. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the empirical nor the DSM-oriented YSR scales adequately screen for DSM/DISC-C psychiatric disorders among incarcerated boys. The use of the YSR and the DISC-C to assess DSM constructs results in, at least partially, different diagnostic information.
Authors: Gail A Wasserman; Larkin S McReynolds; Christopher P Lucas; Prudence Fisher; Linda Santos Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Vladislav V Ruchkin; Mary Schwab-Stone; Roman Koposov; Robert Vermeiren; Hans Steiner Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: D Shaffer; P Fisher; M K Dulcan; M Davies; J Piacentini; M E Schwab-Stone; B B Lahey; K Bourdon; P S Jensen; H R Bird; G Canino; D A Regier Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: T J Crowley; S K Mikulich; K M Ehlers; E A Whitmore; M J MacDonald Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: C W Duclos; J Beals; D K Novins; C Martin; C S Jewett; S M Manson Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Olivier F Colins; Thomas Grisso; Pauline Vahl; Laura Guy; Eva Mulder; Natasja Hornby; Christine Pronk; Monica Markus; Theo Doreleijers; Robert Vermeiren Journal: J Psychopathol Behav Assess Date: 2015
Authors: Kaeleen Dingle; Alexandra Clavarino; Gail M Williams; William Bor; Jake M Najman; Rosa Alati Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Devin E Banks; Alexandra R Hershberger; Taylor Pemberton; Richelle L Clifton; Matthew C Aalsma; Tamika C B Zapolski Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Haley M Kolp; Alexandra R Hershberger; Jasmyn Sanders; Miji Um; Matthew Aalsma; Melissa A Cyders Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 2.164