Lars Eckmann1. 1. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. leckmann@ucsd.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-containing proteins are innate immune sensors for microbial signature molecules. This review highlights new insights into the functions of these sensors in intestinal physiology. RECENT FINDINGS: TLRs are membrane bound and survey the extracellular space for microbe-derived molecules, while NOD-containing proteins are cytoplasmic and detect microbial molecules in the cytoplasm. Most microbial sensors recognize components of the bacterial cell wall and its appendages. For example, TLR4 detects lipopolysaccharide in the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall. TLR5 recognizes flagellin, a component of bacterial flagella required for motility. NOD1 recognizes diaminopimelic acid-containing dipeptide or tripeptide motifs in the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall, while NOD2 detects muramyl dipeptide, a ubiquitous cell wall peptidoglycan motif. These sensors are important for host defense against gastrointestinal pathogens. Thus, TLR4 is required for Salmonella eradication, NOD1 contributes to controlling Helicobacter pylori infection, and NOD2 is involved in mucosal defense against Listeria monocytogenes. These sensors also regulate mucosal inflammation independent of pathogen infections. SUMMARY: Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing proteins not only play critical roles in host defense against known gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens, but also contribute to mucosal homeostasis in the apparent absence of such pathogens.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-containing proteins are innate immune sensors for microbial signature molecules. This review highlights new insights into the functions of these sensors in intestinal physiology. RECENT FINDINGS: TLRs are membrane bound and survey the extracellular space for microbe-derived molecules, while NOD-containing proteins are cytoplasmic and detect microbial molecules in the cytoplasm. Most microbial sensors recognize components of the bacterial cell wall and its appendages. For example, TLR4 detects lipopolysaccharide in the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall. TLR5 recognizes flagellin, a component of bacterial flagella required for motility. NOD1 recognizes diaminopimelic acid-containing dipeptide or tripeptide motifs in the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall, while NOD2 detects muramyldipeptide, a ubiquitous cell wall peptidoglycan motif. These sensors are important for host defense against gastrointestinal pathogens. Thus, TLR4 is required for Salmonella eradication, NOD1 contributes to controlling Helicobacter pylori infection, and NOD2 is involved in mucosal defense against Listeria monocytogenes. These sensors also regulate mucosal inflammation independent of pathogen infections. SUMMARY: Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing proteins not only play critical roles in host defense against known gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens, but also contribute to mucosal homeostasis in the apparent absence of such pathogens.
Authors: Marjaneh Razmara; Srinivasa M Srinivasula; Lin Wang; Jean-Luc Poyet; Brad J Geddes; Peter S DiStefano; John Bertin; Emad S Alnemri Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-01-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: N Pathan; H Marusawa; M Krajewska; S Matsuzawa; H Kim; K Okada; S Torii; S Kitada; S Krajewski; K Welsh; F Pio; A Godzik; J C Reed Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-06-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: S E Girardin; R Tournebize; M Mavris; A L Page; X Li; G R Stark; J Bertin; P S DiStefano; M Yaniv; P J Sansonetti; D J Philpott Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2001-07-19 Impact factor: 8.807
Authors: J Bertin; Y Guo; L Wang; S M Srinivasula; M D Jacobson; J L Poyet; S Merriam; M Q Du; M J Dyer; K E Robison; P S DiStefano; E S Alnemri Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-12-29 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Deanna L Gibson; Caixia Ma; Carrie M Rosenberger; Kirk S B Bergstrom; Yanet Valdez; Jingtian T Huang; Mohammed A Khan; Bruce A Vallance Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Naohiro Inohara; Yasunori Ogura; Ana Fontalba; Olga Gutierrez; Fernando Pons; Javier Crespo; Koichi Fukase; Seiichi Inamura; Shoichi Kusumoto; Masahito Hashimoto; Simon J Foster; Anthony P Moran; Jose L Fernandez-Luna; Gabriel Nuñez Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-01-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Stephen E Girardin; Ivo G Boneca; Leticia A M Carneiro; Aude Antignac; Muguette Jéhanno; Jérôme Viala; Karsten Tedin; Muhamed-Kheir Taha; Agnes Labigne; Ulrich Zähringer; Anthony J Coyle; Peter S DiStefano; John Bertin; Philippe J Sansonetti; Dana J Philpott Journal: Science Date: 2003-06-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: V Koussoulas; S Vassiliou; E J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; G Tassias; A Kotsaki; C Barbatzas; M Tzivras Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Vincent M Bruno; Sebastian Hannemann; María Lara-Tejero; Richard A Flavell; Steven H Kleinstein; Jorge E Galán Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 6.823