Literature DB >> 16461570

Can the laboratory affect the investigation and diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis?

D Sinclair1, A Spedding, R Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterised by the presence of various laboratory abnormalities but the precise role of laboratory staff in initiating clinical referral and subsequent biopsy is not clear.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of laboratory abnormalities in the investigation of PBC.
METHODS: In a retrospective study of laboratory results over nine years from 1996, computer records were reviewed to identify how many referrals for biopsy were initiated and subsequent diagnoses made as a result of clinical signs, raised serum alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP), raised IgM concentration, or positive mitochondrial antibodies accompanied by a clinical comment from the laboratory suggesting further action.
RESULTS: 22 diagnoses of PBC were confirmed by histopathology. Eleven had high ALP activity which had follow up tests initiated by the laboratory (mitochondrial antibodies or IgM or both) and a comment added suggesting further investigation into the possibility of PBC. Seven had abnormal liver antibodies and one had a high polyclonal IgM concentration which prompted the relevant follow on testing and comments. One had an earlier diagnosis made on serological/clinical grounds and the biopsy was a confirmatory measure. One had no liver related antibodies. One had a request by laboratory staff for follow on tests but these were not asked for in subsequent samples by the requesting clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive role for laboratory staff in the diagnosis of PBC. Unexplained rises in ALP activity, positive mitochondrial antibodies, or raised IgM concentrations should be investigated more fully by laboratory staff and advice given to prompt a clinical referral for review and biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461570      PMCID: PMC1860362          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.028936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  11 in total

1.  Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms.

Authors:  W J Marshall; G S Challand
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Antibodies to thyroid peroxidase (TPOAb) in serum from patients with slightly raised thyrotropin (TSH) levels.

Authors:  Phillip Briston; David Sinclair
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.138

3.  What happens to patients with positive tissue transglutaminase and endomysium antibody results in general practice?

Authors:  D Sinclair; H Duncan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Natural history of early primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  J V Metcalf; H C Mitchison; J M Palmer; D E Jones; M F Bassendine; O F James
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Incidence and prevalence of primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis in a Norwegian population.

Authors:  K M Boberg; E Aadland; J Jahnsen; N Raknerud; M Stiris; H Bell
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments.

Authors:  S D Vasikaran; L Penberthy; J Gill; S Scott; K A Sikaris
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  Subclinical hypothyroidism: a comparison of strategies to achieve adherence to treatment guidelines.

Authors:  R J Lock; N A Marden; H J Kemp; P H Thomas; D J Goldie; M M Gompels
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.057

8.  Can the addition of interpretative comments to laboratory reports influence outcome? An example involving patients taking thyroxine.

Authors:  E S Kilpatrick
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 9.  Primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jayant A Talwalkar; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Quality assessment of interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  Ee Mun Lim; Ken A Sikaris; Janice Gill; John Calleja; Peter E Hickman; John Beilby; Samuel D Vasikaran
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reflex and reflective testing: progress, but much still to be done.

Authors:  Michael J Murphy
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.