Literature DB >> 16461405

Structural transitions of confined model proteins: molecular dynamics simulation and experimental validation.

Diannan Lu1, Zheng Liu, Jianzhong Wu.   

Abstract

Proteins fold in a confined space not only in vivo, i.e., folding assisted by molecular chaperons and chaperonins in a crowded cellular medium, but also in vitro as in production of recombinant proteins. Despite extensive work on protein folding in bulk, little is known about how and to what extent the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding are altered by confinement. In this work, we use a Gō-like off-lattice model to investigate the folding and stability of an all beta-sheet protein in spherical cages of different sizes and surface hydrophobicity. We find whereas extreme confinement inhibits correct folding, a hydrophilic cage stabilizes the protein due to restriction of the unfolded configurations. In a hydrophobic cage, however, strong attraction from the cage surface destabilizes the confined protein because of competition between self-aggregation and adsorption of hydrophobic residues. We show that the kinetics of protein collapse and folding is strongly correlated with both the cage size and the surface hydrophobicity. It is demonstrated that a cage of moderate size and hydrophobicity optimizes both the folding yield and kinetics of structural transitions. To support the simulation results, we have also investigated the refolding of hen-egg lysozyme in the presence of cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB) surfactants that provide an effective confinement of the proteins by micellization. The influence of the surfactant hydrophobicity on the structural and biological activity of the protein is determined with circular dichroism spectrum, fluorescence emission spectrum, and biological activity assay. It is shown that, as predicted by coarse-grained simulations, CTAB micelles facilitate the collapse of denatured lysozyme, whereas the addition of beta-cyclodextrin-grafted-PNIPAAm, a weakly hydrophobic stripper, dissociates CTAB micelles and promotes the conformational rearrangement and thereby gives an improved recovery of lysozyme activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461405      PMCID: PMC1432124          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  38 in total

1.  Thermodynamics and stability of a beta-sheet complex: molecular dynamics simulations on simplified off-lattice protein models.

Authors:  Hyunbum Jang; Carol K Hall; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Caging helps proteins fold.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; Dmitri K Klimov; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein folding and binding in confined spaces and in crowded solutions.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.137

Review 4.  Protein folding: importance of the Anfinsen cage.

Authors:  R John Ellis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Principles of chaperone-assisted protein folding: differences between in vitro and in vivo mechanisms.

Authors:  J Frydman; F U Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Protein folding in vivo and renaturation of recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies.

Authors:  A D Guise; S M West; J B Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Factors governing the foldability of proteins.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-12

8.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release.

Authors:  W A Fenton; Y Kashi; K Furtak; A L Horwich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Conformation of GroEL-bound alpha-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  C V Robinson; M Gross; S J Eyles; J J Ewbank; M Mayhew; F U Hartl; C M Dobson; S E Radford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Artificial chaperone-assisted refolding of carbonic anhydrase B.

Authors:  D Rozema; S H Gellman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-02-16       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  6 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulations of proteins in cages: influence of confinement on the stability of intermediate states.

Authors:  Pedro Ojeda; Martin E Garcia; Aurora Londoño; Nan-Yow Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Assisted peptide folding by surface pattern recognition.

Authors:  Zhuoyun Zhuang; Andrew I Jewett; Silvan Kuttimalai; Giovanni Bellesia; S Gnanakaran; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Molecular Modeling in Anion Exchange Membrane Research: A Brief Review of Recent Applications.

Authors:  Mirat Karibayev; Sandugash Kalybekkyzy; Yanwei Wang; Almagul Mentbayeva
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Protein folding requires crowd control in a simulated cell.

Authors:  Benjamin R Jefferys; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A blood-brain barrier (BBB) disrupter is also a potent α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregation inhibitor: a novel dual mechanism of mannitol for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD).

Authors:  Ronit Shaltiel-Karyo; Moran Frenkel-Pinter; Edward Rockenstein; Christina Patrick; Michal Levy-Sakin; Abigail Schiller; Nirit Egoz-Matia; Eliezer Masliah; Daniel Segal; Ehud Gazit
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The molecular dynamics of bacterial spore and the role of calcium dipicolinate in core properties at the sub-nanosecond time-scale.

Authors:  Alexandre Colas de la Noue; Francesca Natali; Fatima Fekraoui; Patrick Gervais; Nicolas Martinez; Jean-Marie Perrier-Cornet; Judith Peters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.