Literature DB >> 16461248

A randomized clinical study of tea catechin inhalation effects on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in disabled elderly patients.

Hiroshi Yamada1, Masato Tateishi, Kazuhiro Harada, Toshihiko Ohashi, Takako Shimizu, Tetsushi Atsumi, Yasuko Komagata, Hajime Iijima, Kanki Komiyama, Hiroshi Watanabe, Yukihiko Hara, Kyoichi Ohashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of tea catechin inhalation on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in disabled elderly patients.
DESIGN: Seven days, randomized, prospective study.
SETTING: Three hospitals in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two patients aged 78 +/- 11 years (mean age +/- standard deviation) with cerebrovascular diseases, classified as disabled according to the activity of daily living and were either bedridden or required assistance for standing, and showing presence of MRSA in sputum.
INTERVENTIONS: Inhalation of 2 mL tea catechin extract solution along with saline (3.7 mg/mL catechins, 43% of catechins are composed of epigallocatechin gallate), or saline alone, 3 times daily using a handheld nebulizer for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS: The endpoint of efficacy was the reduction rates of MRSA in sputum. The safety measure was the adverse events observed during the 7 days of inhalation.
RESULTS: The reduction rates calculated as the summation of decrease and disappearance of MRSA in sputum at 7 days were 47% (17 of 36 patients) in the catechin group and 15% (5 of 33 patients) in the control group; the difference in the reduction rates between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = .014). The disappearance rate of MRSA in sputum was higher in the catechin group (31%; 11 patients) when compared with the control group (12%; 4 patients), however the difference in the disappearance rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P = .091). No adverse events, such as respiratory tract obstruction, allergic bronchial spasm, or skin eruption, including laboratory changes, were observed during the study.
CONCLUSION: The catechin inhalation appeared to reduce the MRSA count in sputum. However, the application of tea catechin inhalation as a supplementary treatment for controlling MRSA infection remains controversial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16461248     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  6 in total

1.  Epigenetic changes induced by curcumin and other natural compounds.

Authors:  Simone Reuter; Subash C Gupta; Byoungduck Park; Ajay Goel; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Tea and coffee consumption and MRSA nasal carriage.

Authors:  Eric M Matheson; Arch G Mainous; Charles J Everett; Dana E King
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Pharmacokinetic Study of Bioactive Flavonoids in the Traditional Japanese Medicine Keigairengyoto Exerting Antibacterial Effects against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Takashi Matsumoto; Atsushi Kaneko; Junichi Koseki; Yosuke Matsubara; Setsuya Aiba; Kenshi Yamasaki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms of Possible Action of Phenolic Compounds in COVID-19 Protection and Prevention.

Authors:  Nikola Gligorijevic; Mirjana Radomirovic; Olgica Nedic; Marija Stojadinovic; Urmila Khulal; Dragana Stanic-Vucinic; Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Effects of green tea compound epigallocatechin-3-gallate against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and biofilm.

Authors:  Pedrina G Vidigal; Mathias Müsken; Katrin A Becker; Susanne Häussler; Jost Wingender; Eike Steinmann; Jan Kehrmann; Erich Gulbins; Jan Buer; Peter Michael Rath; Jörg Steinmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of the Potential Nephroprotective and Antimicrobial Effect of Camellia sinensis Leaves versus Hibiscus sabdariffa (In Vivo and In Vitro Studies).

Authors:  Doa'a Anwar Ibrahim; Rowida Noman Albadani
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014-05-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.