Literature DB >> 16461177

The efficiency of multiple impulse therapy for musculoskeletal complaints.

Daniel L Collins1, Joseph M Evans, Reed H Grundy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to document the response of patients to multiple impulse therapy for a variety of musculoskeletal complaints encountered in clinical practice.
METHODS: A single practitioner in a private clinic setting provided the therapy to 249 patients. Survival analysis was used to plot probability of pain vs the days required for symptom resolution for each of 8 patient complaints. Analysis of variance was used to examine the influence of covariates such as age, sex, body mass index, and chronicity.
RESULTS: The average number of visits required to achieve a pain-free state for each of 8 patient symptoms, the half-life for response to multiple impulse therapy, and comparison of the results of published studies of low back and neck pain are presented.
CONCLUSION: Response of patients in the study sample to multiple impulse therapy for symptoms of low back and neck pain appeared to be considerably faster than that obtained in 3 recent studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461177     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  2 in total

Review 1.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  How little pain and disability do patients with low back pain have to experience to feel that they have recovered?

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Mark J Hancock; Julia M Hush; Robert J Smeets
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.