Literature DB >> 16461078

True prevalence of urinary incontinence among female nursing home residents.

Jennifer T Anger1, Christopher S Saigal, Jennifer Pace, Larissa V Rodríguez, Mark S Litwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence is a significant problem in nursing home residents in the United States. Estimates of its prevalence have often been based on data from medical records obtained at nursing home admission. To measure the sensitivity of this method of defining the prevalence of urinary incontinence among female nursing home residents, we examined data from a clinical survey.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Nursing Home Survey, which collected information from nursing homes for each resident concerning admission diagnoses, presence of an indwelling Foley catheter or ostomy, need for assistance from equipment or personnel in using the toilet, and difficulty controlling urination.
RESULTS: Residents' medical records revealed a very low rate of admission diagnoses of incontinence. However, clinical queries revealed a high prevalence of bladder dysfunction. More than one half of all female nursing home residents were reported to have "difficulty controlling urination," and more than one half needed assistance in using the toilet.
CONCLUSIONS: Although only 1% to 2% of nursing home residents have a diagnosis of urinary incontinence, the true prevalence of bladder dysfunction in this group is much greater. The sharp divergence of National Nursing Home Survey data from published studies on the prevalence of incontinence in nursing homes highlights the limitations of using administrative data to study the epidemiology of bladder dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461078     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

1.  [New-onset urinary incontinence in the first six month after admission into a nursing home: prevalence, incidence and remission, risk and protective factors].

Authors:  Katja Boguth; Liane Schenk
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America.

Authors:  David C Miller; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.