Literature DB >> 16460886

Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.

Olga F Lazareva1, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Transitive responding in humans and non-human animals has attracted considerable attention because of its presumably inferential nature. In an attempt to replicate our earlier study with crows [Lazareva, O.F., Smirnova, A.A., Bagozkaja, M.S., Zorina, Z.A., Rayevsky, V.V., Wasserman, E.A., 2004. Transitive responding in hooded crows requires linearly ordered stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 82, 1-19], we trained pigeons to discriminate overlapping pairs of colored squares (A+ B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, and D+ E-). For some birds, the colored squares, or primary stimuli, were followed by a circle of the same color (feedback stimuli) whose diameter decreased from A to E (Ordered Feedback group); these circles were made available to help order the stimuli along a physical dimension. For other birds, all of the feedback stimuli had the same diameter (Constant Feedback group). In later testing, novel choice pairs were presented, including the critical BD pair. The pigeons' reinforcement history with Stimuli B and D was controlled, so that the birds should not have chosen Stimulus B during the BD test. Unlike the crows, the pigeons selected Stimulus B over Stimulus D in both ordered and Constant Feedback groups, suggesting that the orderability of the post-choice feedback stimuli did not affect pigeons' transitive responding. Post hoc simulations showed that associative models [Wynne, C.D.L., 1995. Reinforcement accounts for transitive inference (TI) performance. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23, 207-217; Siemann, M., Delius, J.D., 1998. Algebraic learning and neural network models for transitive and non-transitive responding. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 10, 307-334] failed to predict pigeons' responding in the BD test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16460886     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  14 in total

1.  Six-term transitive inference with pigeons: successive-pair training followed by mixed-pair training.

Authors:  Carter W Daniels; Jennifer R Laude; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Endpoint distinctiveness facilitates analogical mapping in pigeons.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Cognitive representation in transitive inference: a comparison of four corvid species.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Cynthia A Wei; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Effects of spatial training on transitive inference performance in humans and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Olga F Lazareva; Clara N Bergene; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  Transitive inference in Polistes paper wasps.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Jorge Agudelo; Sohini Pandit; Jessica Riojas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Cognitive mechanisms for transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys: measuring the influence of associative strength and inferred order.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Nicholas W Chee; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-10

7.  Associative models fail to characterize transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Regina Paxton Gazes; Zachary Elkins; Robert Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Inferential Learning of Serial Order of Perceptual Categories by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Natalie Tanner; Greg Jensen; Vincent P Ferrera; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Influence of Rule- and Reward-based Strategies on Inferences of Serial Order by Monkeys.

Authors:  Allain-Thibeault Ferhat; Greg Jensen; Herbert S Terrace; Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  European starlings unriddle the ambiguous-cue problem.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Tiago Monteiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.