R D Bagnall1, F Giannelli, P M Green. 1. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College School of Medicine, London, UK. richard.bagnall@genetics.kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intrachromosomal, homologous recombination of the duplicon int22h-1 with int22h-2 or int22h-3 causes inversions accounting for 45% of severe hemophilia A, hence the belief that int22h-2 and int22h-3 are in opposite orientation to int22h-1. However, inversions involving int22h-2 are five times rarer than those involving its virtually identical copy: int22h-3. Recent sequencing has indicated that int22h-2 and int22h-3 form the internal part of the arms of an imperfect palindrome so that int22h-2, in the centromeric arm, has the same orientation as int22h-1 and, upon recombination with int22h-1, should produce deletions and duplications but not inversions. AIM: This work aims to provide rapid tests for all the mutations that can result from recombinations between the int22h sequences and to investigate whether int22h-2-related inversions causing hemophilia A arise in chromosomes, where the arms of the palindrome have recombined so that int22h-2 and int22h-3 swap places and orientation. PATIENTS/ METHODS: Twenty patients with int22h-related inversions were examined together with a control and inversion carriers using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), long-range PCR and sequencing. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of mRNA in patients and a control provided evidence confirming the palindromic arrangement of int22h-2 and int22h-3 and the proposed inversion polymorphism that allows int22h-2 to be in the telomeric arm of the palindrome and in opposite orientation to int22h-1. New long-range PCR reactions were used to develop a single tube test that detects and discriminates inversions involving int22h-2 or int22h-3 and a two-tube test that can distinguish inversions, deletions, and duplications due to recombination between int22h sequences.
BACKGROUND: Intrachromosomal, homologous recombination of the duplicon int22h-1 with int22h-2 or int22h-3 causes inversions accounting for 45% of severe hemophilia A, hence the belief that int22h-2 and int22h-3 are in opposite orientation to int22h-1. However, inversions involving int22h-2 are five times rarer than those involving its virtually identical copy: int22h-3. Recent sequencing has indicated that int22h-2 and int22h-3 form the internal part of the arms of an imperfect palindrome so that int22h-2, in the centromeric arm, has the same orientation as int22h-1 and, upon recombination with int22h-1, should produce deletions and duplications but not inversions. AIM: This work aims to provide rapid tests for all the mutations that can result from recombinations between the int22h sequences and to investigate whether int22h-2-related inversions causing hemophilia A arise in chromosomes, where the arms of the palindrome have recombined so that int22h-2 and int22h-3 swap places and orientation. PATIENTS/ METHODS: Twenty patients with int22h-related inversions were examined together with a control and inversion carriers using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), long-range PCR and sequencing. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of mRNA in patients and a control provided evidence confirming the palindromic arrangement of int22h-2 and int22h-3 and the proposed inversion polymorphism that allows int22h-2 to be in the telomeric arm of the palindrome and in opposite orientation to int22h-1. New long-range PCR reactions were used to develop a single tube test that detects and discriminates inversions involving int22h-2 or int22h-3 and a two-tube test that can distinguish inversions, deletions, and duplications due to recombination between int22h sequences.
Authors: Irena Hudecova; Peiyong Jiang; Joanna Davies; Y M Dennis Lo; Rezan A Kadir; Rossa W K Chiu Journal: Blood Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Christine L Kempton; Geoff Allen; Jeffrey Hord; Rebecca Kruse-Jarres; Rajiv K Pruthi; Christopher Walsh; Guy Young; J Michael Soucie Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Jill M Johnsen; Shelley N Fletcher; Haley Huston; Sarah Roberge; Beth K Martin; Martin Kircher; Neil C Josephson; Jay Shendure; Sarah Ruuska; Marion A Koerper; Jaime Morales; Glenn F Pierce; Diane J Aschman; Barbara A Konkle Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2017-05-18
Authors: C L Kempton; J M Soucie; C H Miller; C Hooper; M A Escobar; A J Cohen; N S Key; A R Thompson; T C Abshire Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.824