I Street1, J Hamann, M Harries. 1. ENT Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK. ianstreet@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several options exist with regard to flexible pharyngo-laryngoscope sterilisation. We audited the use of disposable sheaths in our department over a six-month period. METHODS: A cost-analysis was performed and the advantages and disadvantages of this system were compared with several alternative options. RESULTS: We found that the overall cost of disposable sheaths averaged ł4008 per month over a six-month period. We subsequently introduced chlorine dioxide (ClO2) wipes as a means of disinfection. Chlorine dioxide wipes have enabled a monthly saving of ł3145 over sheath usage. Additionally, they meet health regulation requirements and are a convenient, cost-effective alternative to sheaths. DISCUSSION: The limiting factors, including time and financial issues, involved in nasendoscope disinfection are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We have found chlorine dioxide wipes to be a satisfactory alternative means of nasendoscope disinfection. Possible time constraints aside, there are no advantages of sheath use over our current method. Chlorine dioxide wipes are also preferable from a financial point of view.
INTRODUCTION: Several options exist with regard to flexible pharyngo-laryngoscope sterilisation. We audited the use of disposable sheaths in our department over a six-month period. METHODS: A cost-analysis was performed and the advantages and disadvantages of this system were compared with several alternative options. RESULTS: We found that the overall cost of disposable sheaths averaged ł4008 per month over a six-month period. We subsequently introduced chlorine dioxide (ClO2) wipes as a means of disinfection. Chlorine dioxide wipes have enabled a monthly saving of ł3145 over sheath usage. Additionally, they meet health regulation requirements and are a convenient, cost-effective alternative to sheaths. DISCUSSION: The limiting factors, including time and financial issues, involved in nasendoscope disinfection are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We have found chlorine dioxide wipes to be a satisfactory alternative means of nasendoscope disinfection. Possible time constraints aside, there are no advantages of sheath use over our current method. Chlorine dioxide wipes are also preferable from a financial point of view.
Authors: C Kyriacou; E Robinson; J Barcroft; N Parker; M Tuomey; C Stalder; D Gould; M Al-Memar; T Bourne Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 8.678