Literature DB >> 16459436

A scale to assess attitudes toward euthanasia.

Jason Wasserman1, Jeffrey Michael Clair, Ferris J Ritchey.   

Abstract

The topic of euthanasia has been a matter of public debate for several decades. Although empirical research should inform policy, scale measurement is lacking. After analyzing shortcomings of previous work, we offer a systematically designed scale to measure attitudes toward euthanasia. We attempt to encompass previously unspecified dimensions of the phenomenon that are central to the euthanasia debate. The results of our pretest show that our attitude towards euthanasia (ATE) scale is both reliable and valid. We delineate active and passive euthanasia, no chance for recovery and severe pain, and patient's autonomy and doctor's authority. We argue that isolating these factors provides a more robust scale capable of better analyzing sample variance. Internal consistency is established with Cronbach's alpha=.871. Construct external consistency is established by correlating the scale with other predictors such as race and spirituality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16459436     DOI: 10.2190/FGHE-YXHX-QJEA-MTM0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Omega (Westport)        ISSN: 0030-2228


  7 in total

1.  Attitude towards Euthanasia among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Amy Mei-Yin Lau; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales.

Authors:  Naser Aghababaei; Hojjatollah Farahani; Javad Hatami
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation.

Authors:  Michael Nair-Collins; Sydney R Green; Angelina R Sutin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Trust increases euthanasia acceptance: a multilevel analysis using the European Values Study.

Authors:  Vanessa Köneke
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Moral Evaluations of Organ Transplantation Influence Judgments of Death and Causation.

Authors:  Michael Nair-Collins; Mary A Gerend
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.480

6.  Attitudes of Psychiatric Nurses about the Request for Euthanasia on the Basis of Unbearable Mental Suffering(UMS).

Authors:  Marc De Hert; Liesbet Van Bos; Kim Sweers; Martien Wampers; Jan De Lepeleire; Christophe U Correll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  H M M T B Herath; K W S M Wijayawardhana; U I Wickramarachchi; Chaturaka Rodrigo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.