Literature DB >> 16459324

A practical extension of hydrodynamic theory of porous transport for hydrophilic solutes.

James B Bassingthwaighte1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The equations for transport of hydrophilic solutes through aqueous pores provide a fundamental basis for examining capillary-tissue exchange and water and solute flux through transmembrane channels, but the theory remains incomplete for ratios, alpha, of sphere diameters to pore diameters greater than 0.4. Values for permeabilities, P, and reflection coefficients, sigma, from Lewellen, working with Lightfoot et al., at alpha = 0.5 and 0.95, were combined with earlier values for alpha < 0.4, and the physically required values at alpha = 1.0, to provide accurate expressions over the whole range of 0 < alpha < 1.
METHODS: The "data" were the long-accepted theory for alpha < 0.2 and the computational results from Lewellen and Lightfoot et al. on hard spheres (of 5 different alpha's) moving by convection and diffusion through a tight cylindrical pore, accounting for molecular exclusion, viscous forces, pressure drop, torque and rotation of spheres off the center line (averaging across all accessible radial positions), and the asymptotic values at alpha = 1.0. Coefficients for frictional hindrance to diffusion, F(alpha), and drag, G(alpha), and functions for sigma(alpha) and P(alpha), were represented by power law functions and the parameters optimized to give best fits to the combined "data."
RESULTS: The reflection coefficient sigma = {1 - [1 - (1 - phi)2]G'(alpha)} + 2alpha2 phi F'(alpha), and the relative permeability P/Pmax = phi F '(alpha)[1 + 9alpha5.5 x (1.0 - alpha5)0.02], where phi is the partition coefficient or volume fraction of the pore available to solute. The new expression for the diffusive hindrance is F'(alpha) = (1 - alpha2)(3/2) phi/[1 + 0.2 x alpha2 x (1 - alpha2)16], and for the drag factor is G'(alpha) = (1 - 2alpha(2)/3 - 0.20217 alpha5)/(1 - 0.75851 alpha5) - 0.0431[1 - (1 - alpha10)]. All of these converge monotonically to the correct limits at alpha = 1.
CONCLUSIONS: These are the first expressions providing hydrodynamically based estimates of sigma(alpha) and P(alpha) over 0 < alpha < 1 They should be accurate to within 1-2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16459324      PMCID: PMC3420965          DOI: 10.1080/10739680500466384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microcirculation        ISSN: 1073-9688            Impact factor:   2.628


  18 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular permeability.

Authors:  C C Michel; F E Curry
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  General continuum analysis of transport through pores. I. Proof of Onsager's reciprocity postulate for uniform pore.

Authors:  D G Levitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Screened hydrodynamic interaction in a narrow channel.

Authors:  Bianxiao Cui; Haim Diamant; Binhua Lin
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes.

Authors:  O KEDEM; A KATCHALSKY
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1958-02

5.  Filtration, diffusion, and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes.

Authors:  E M RENKIN
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1954-11-20       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Hydrodynamic models for diffusion in microporous membranes.

Authors:  E N Lightfoot; J B Bassingthwaighte; E F Grabowski
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Hindrance of solute diffusion within membranes as measured with microporous membranes of known pore geometry.

Authors:  R E Beck; J S Schultz
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-01-17

8.  A hydrodynamic description of the osmotic reflection coefficient with application to the pore theory of transcapillary exchange.

Authors:  F E Curry
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.514

9.  Restricted transport in small pores. A model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion.

Authors:  J L Anderson; J A Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  The mechanics and thermodynamics of separation flow through porous, molecularly disperse, solid media - the Poiseuille Lecture 1981.

Authors:  A Silberberg
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.875

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multiscale modeling of metabolism, flows, and exchanges in heterogeneous organs.

Authors:  James B Bassingthwaighte; Gary M Raymond; Erik Butterworth; Adam Alessio; James H Caldwell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  IL-6 adsorption dynamics in hemoadsorption beads studied using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Kimmel; Gregory A Gibson; Simon C Watkins; John A Kellum; William J Federspiel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Multiscale model of liver DCE-MRI towards a better understanding of tumor complexity.

Authors:  Muriel Mescam; Marek Kretowski; Johanne Bezy-Wendling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Experimental validation of a theoretical model of cytokine capture using a hemoadsorption device.

Authors:  Morgan V DiLeo; James D Fisher; William J Federspiel
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Modeling serotonin uptake in the lung shows endothelial transporters dominate over cleft permeation.

Authors:  Bartholomew Jardine; James B Bassingthwaighte
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Differentiating Between Tight Junction-Dependent and Tight Junction-Independent Intestinal Barrier Loss In Vivo.

Authors:  Sandra D Chanez-Paredes; Shabnam Abtahi; Wei-Ting Kuo; Jerrold R Turner
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  Molecular exclusion limits for diffusion across a porous capsid.

Authors:  Ekaterina Selivanovitch; Benjamin LaFrance; Trevor Douglas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) diminishes glycocalyx degradation and decreases vascular permeability during systemic and pulmonary inflammation in mice.

Authors:  Andreas Margraf; Jan M Herter; Katharina Kühne; Anika Stadtmann; Thomas Ermert; Manuel Wenk; Melanie Meersch; Hugo Van Aken; Alexander Zarbock; Jan Rossaint
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.