Literature DB >> 16459106

Restored speech comprehension linked to activity in left inferior prefrontal and right temporal cortices in postlingual deafness.

Malene Vejby Mortensen1, Frank Mirz, Albert Gjedde.   

Abstract

The left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPC) is involved in speech comprehension by people who hear normally. In contrast, functional brain mapping has not revealed incremental activity in this region when users of cochlear implants comprehend speech without silent repetition. Functional brain maps identify significant changes of activity by comparing an active brain state with a presumed baseline condition. It is possible that cochlear implant users recruited alternative neuronal resources to the task in previous studies, but, in principle, it is also possible that an aberrant baseline condition masked the functional increase. To distinguish between the two possibilities, we tested the hypothesis that activity in the LIPC characterizes high speech comprehension in postlingually deaf CI users. We measured cerebral blood flow changes with positron emission tomography (PET) in CI users who listened passively to a range of speech and non-speech stimuli. The pattern of activation varied with the stimulus in users with high speech comprehension, unlike users with low speech comprehension. The high-comprehension group increased the activity in prefrontal and temporal regions of the cerebral cortex and in the right cerebellum. In these subjects, single words and speech raised activity in the LIPC, as well as in left and right temporal regions, both anterior and posterior, known to be activated in speech recognition and complex phoneme analysis in normal hearing. In subjects with low speech comprehension, sites of increased activity were observed only in the temporal lobes. We conclude that increased activity in areas of the LIPC and right temporal lobe is involved in speech comprehension after cochlear implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16459106     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of the salience network in processing lexical and nonlexical stimuli in cochlear implant users: an ALE meta-analysis of PET studies.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Sven Vanneste; Diane S Lazard; Paul Van de Heyning; Joo Hyun Park; Seung Ha Oh; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Evolution of crossmodal reorganization of the voice area in cochlear-implanted deaf patients.

Authors:  Julien Rouger; Sébastien Lagleyre; Jean-François Démonet; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Pascal Barone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition.

Authors:  Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt; Iva Speck; Valentin Rottmayer; Konstantin Wiebe; Antje Aschendorff; Johannes Thurow; Lars Frings; Philipp T Meyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cortical plasticity after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  B Petersen; A Gjedde; M Wallentin; P Vuust
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Brain Plasticity Can Predict the Cochlear Implant Outcome in Adult-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyejin Kang; Seung-Ha Oh; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cortical reorganization following auditory deprivation predicts cochlear implant performance in postlingually deaf adults.

Authors:  Zhe Sun; Ji Won Seo; Hong Ju Park; Jee Yeon Lee; Min Young Kwak; Yehree Kim; Je Yeon Lee; Jun Woo Park; Woo Seok Kang; Joong Ho Ahn; Jong Woo Chung; Hosung Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.