Literature DB >> 16458807

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft.

Raffaele Garofalo1, Ali Djahangiri, Olivier Siegrist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cause of recurrent pathologic instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and the effectiveness of revision reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft using a 2-incision technique. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective follow-up study.
METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, 31 patients underwent ACL revision reconstruction because of recurrent pathologic instability during sports or daily activities. Twenty-eight patients were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 3.3 to 5.6 years). The mean age at revision surgery was 27 years (range, 18 to 41 years). The average time from primary procedure to revision surgery was 26 months (range, 9 to 45 months). A clinical, functional, and radiographic evaluation was performed. Also magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scales were used. A KT-1000 arthrometer measurement (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) by an experienced physician was made.
RESULTS: Of the failures, 79% had radiographic evidence of malposition of their tunnels. In only 6 cases (21%) was the radiologic anatomy of tunnel placement judged to be correct on both the femoral and tibial side. The MRI or CT showed, in 6 cases, a too-centrally placed femoral tunnel. After revision surgery, the position of tunnels was corrected. A significant improvement of Lachman and pivot-shift phenomenon was observed. In particular, 17 patients had a negative Lachman test, and 11 patients had a grade I Lachman with a firm end point. Preoperatively, the pivot-shift test was positive in all cases, and at last follow-up in 7 patients (25%) a grade 1+ was found. Postoperatively, KT-1000 testing showed a mean manual maximum translation of 8.6 mm (SD, 2.34) for the affected knee; 97% of patients had a maximum manual side-to-side translation <5 mm. At the final postoperative evaluation, 26 patients (93%) graded their knees as normal or nearly normal according to the IKDC score. The mean Lysholm score was 93.6 (SD, 8.77) and the mean Tegner activity score was 6.1 (SD, 1.37). No patient required further revision. Five patients (18%) complained of hypersensitive scars from the reconstructive surgery that made kneeling difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: There were satisfactory results after ACL revision surgery using quadriceps tendon and a 2-incision technique at a minimum 3 years' follow-up; 93% of patients returned to sports activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, no control group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458807     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  28 in total

1.  Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Radiographic Anatomy of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaron P Sullivan; Shane Cook; Yubo Gao; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-12-02

4.  Revision ACL reconstruction in skeletally mature athletes younger than 18 years.

Authors:  Keith R Reinhardt; Sommer Hammoud; Andrea L Bowers; Ben-Paul Umunna; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Three dimensionalCT analysis of femoral tunnel position after ACL reconstruction. A prospective study of one hundred and thirty five cases.

Authors:  Olivier Reynaud; Cécile Batailler; Timothy Lording; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  "Central" quadriceps tendon harvest with patellar bone plug: surgical technique revisited.

Authors:  William F Scully; David J Wilson; Edward D Arrington
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-10-24

7.  Minimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone block.

Authors:  Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort; Elisabeth Abermann; Christian Hoser
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-08-11

8.  Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction.

Authors:  Joseph A Morgan; Diane Dahm; Bruce Levy; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The Development and Early to Midterm Findings of the Multicenter Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.