Literature DB >> 16458791

Clusters of census tracts with high proportions of men with distant-stage prostate cancer incidence in New Jersey, 1995 to 1999.

Toshi Abe1, Ilsia B Martin, Lisa M Roche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the etiology of prostate cancer is uncertain, cancer control programs need to know the factors that contribute to variations in prostate cancer incidence from place to place. Geographic patterns of prostate cancer cases diagnosed at the distant stage are particularly important, because survival is substantially lower than for prostate cancer diagnosed at earlier stages. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize clusters of census tracts in New Jersey with significantly high proportions of men diagnosed with distant-stage prostate cancer.
METHODS: Prostate cancer cases diagnosed in New Jersey residents from 1995 to 1999 (n=30,505) were geocoded at the census tract level (n=1938) based on their residences at time of diagnosis. A spatial scan statistic (SaTScan) then was applied to identify clusters of census tracts with elevated proportions of cases of distant stage prostate cancer, using a case-control Bernoulli probability model study design. Distant-stage prostate cancers were defined as cases (n=1230), and all other prostate cancers as controls. Population characteristics from the 1990 Census for the area of the most likely cluster were compared to the remainder of the state.
RESULTS: SaTScan identified a large geographic area in northeast New Jersey as the most likely cluster (RR=1.25, p=0.001). Compared to the remainder of the state, the underlying population in the most likely cluster area had higher proportions of African-American, Hispanic, and Asian men, and was more likely to be foreign-born, undereducated, in poverty, and have limited English speaking ability.
CONCLUSIONS: Spatial analyses of late stage prostate cancer cases can provide additional insights into less favorable outcomes for disadvantaged populations and racial and ethnic minorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458791     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  18 in total

1.  Cluster morphology analysis.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

2.  Predictors of neighborhood risk for late-stage melanoma: addressing disparities through spatial analysis and area-based measures.

Authors:  Shasa Hu; Recinda Sherman; Kristopher Arheart; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 3.  Distribution-free models for longitudinal count responses with overdispersion and structural zeros.

Authors:  Q Yu; R Chen; W Tang; H He; R Gallop; P Crits-Christoph; J Hu; X M Tu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Geographic and racial disparities in breast cancer-related outcomes in Georgia.

Authors:  Talar W Markossian; Robin B Hines; Rana Bayakly
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Analysis of factors associated with prognosis after colorectal cancer resection in 174 Chinese elderly patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiang; Chunxiang Li; Xiaohui Qiu; Ye Xu; Xishan Wang; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Spatial cluster analysis of early stage breast cancer: a method for public health practice using cancer registry data.

Authors:  Jaymie R Meliker; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Pierre Goovaerts; Glenn Copeland; May Yassine
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Follow-up and timeliness after an abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation program.

Authors:  Talar W Markossian; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Rural reversal? Rural-urban disparities in late-stage cancer risk in Illinois.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Fahui Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Using geographic methods to inform cancer screening interventions for South Asians in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Piotr Gozdyra; Rebecca Lobb
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Evaluation of the performance of tests for spatial randomness on prostate cancer data.

Authors:  Virginia L Hinrichsen; Ann C Klassen; Changhong Song; Martin Kulldorff
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.