Aron D Rose1, Vasudev Kanade. 1. Eye Care Group, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut 06510-2716, USA. rose@theeyecaregroup.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess intraoperative thermal levels at the wound site during divide-and-conquer phacoemulsification with the Sovereign with WhiteStar (SWS) system or the Legacy with AdvanTec and NeoSoniX (LAD) system. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group, comparative study. METHODS:Twenty-six subjects from a private clinical practice underwentdivide-and-conquer phacoemulsification with either the SWS system or the LAD system. CB/CF settings (60%/33% duty cycles) were utilized with SWS and 12 pulses per second with the LAD system. Key criteria assessed were peak wound-site temperature, mean temperature change at the wound site, effective phaco time, average phaco power, procedure time, amount of BSS used, and surgical complications. RESULTS:Mean temperature change at the wound site was greater for the LAD than the SWS group. There was a statistically significant difference (P=.0002) in mean peak wound temperatures, with the LAD group having higher mean peak temperatures (42.47+/-5.33 degrees C) than the SWS group (36.59+/-1.33 degrees C). Highest wound-site temperature was 51 degrees C for the LAD group and 39.3 degrees C for the SWS group. A statistically significant difference (P=.0031) in mean peak temperature was found between the LAD and SWS systems for subjects with a cataract density of 4: higher mean peak temperatures were observed for LAD patients with a cataract density of 4. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that phacoemulsification using the SWS system results in lower peak temperatures and less temperature change at the phaco wound site compared with the LAD system.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess intraoperative thermal levels at the wound site during divide-and-conquer phacoemulsification with the Sovereign with WhiteStar (SWS) system or the Legacy with AdvanTec and NeoSoniX (LAD) system. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group, comparative study. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects from a private clinical practice underwent divide-and-conquer phacoemulsification with either the SWS system or the LAD system. CB/CF settings (60%/33% duty cycles) were utilized with SWS and 12 pulses per second with the LAD system. Key criteria assessed were peak wound-site temperature, mean temperature change at the wound site, effective phaco time, average phaco power, procedure time, amount of BSS used, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Mean temperature change at the wound site was greater for the LAD than the SWS group. There was a statistically significant difference (P=.0002) in mean peak wound temperatures, with the LAD group having higher mean peak temperatures (42.47+/-5.33 degrees C) than the SWS group (36.59+/-1.33 degrees C). Highest wound-site temperature was 51 degrees C for the LAD group and 39.3 degrees C for the SWS group. A statistically significant difference (P=.0031) in mean peak temperature was found between the LAD and SWS systems for subjects with a cataract density of 4: higher mean peak temperatures were observed for LADpatients with a cataract density of 4. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that phacoemulsification using the SWS system results in lower peak temperatures and less temperature change at the phaco wound site compared with the LAD system.