Literature DB >> 16458541

Safety and feasibility of percutaneous autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation in the coil-infarcted swine myocardium.

Nabil Dib1, Ann Campbell, Douglas B Jacoby, Agatha Zawadzka, Judson Ratliff, Brigitte M Miedzybrocki, Amir Gahremanpour, Edward B Diethrich, Shaun R Opie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation (ASMT) for myocardial regeneration is a promising new treatment for patients with congestive heart failure secondary to myocardial infarction (MI). However, non-surgical delivery could broaden the utility of this approach. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transplanting autologous skeletal myoblast (ASM) via endovascular delivery into the infarcted swine myocardium.
METHODS: Seven female Yorkshire swine successfully underwent induced left ventricular MI. ASM biopsies were obtained from the hind limb of each animal and myoblasts were expanded in vitro. In a pilot experiment, ASM were labeled with iridium and short-term retention and biodistribution was determined 2 h after ASM delivery via the MyoStar needle-injection catheter inserted through the femoral artery. At 30 days post-infarction, the remaining animals were divided into three groups containing 2 animals each for percutaneous catheter delivery into the infarcted zone: group 1 control animals were injected with media only, group 2 and 3 animals were injected with approximately 300 x 10(6) and 600 x 10(6) ASM, respectively. Sixty days post-transplantation, the swine hearts were harvested.
RESULTS: During the 60-day period between transplantation and harvest, no adverse events were recorded, and continuous rhythm monitoring revealed no arrhythmias. In the small sampling size, myocardial function assessments revealed a trend toward improvement in the treatment groups with respect to ejection fraction, viability, and cardiac index. However, histology of treated swine hearts identified no skeletal muscle cells. DISCUSSION: Percutaneous ASMT into an infarcted swine myocardium is feasible and safe, and may contribute to overall improved heart function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458541     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  9 in total

Review 1.  De novo myocardial regeneration: advances and pitfalls.

Authors:  Khawaja Husnain Haider; Stephanie Buccini; Rafeeq P H Ahmed; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Catheter-deliverable hydrogel derived from decellularized ventricular extracellular matrix increases endogenous cardiomyocytes and preserves cardiac function post-myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jennifer M Singelyn; Priya Sundaramurthy; Todd D Johnson; Pamela J Schup-Magoffin; Diane P Hu; Denver M Faulk; Jean Wang; Kristine M Mayle; Kendra Bartels; Michael Salvatore; Adam M Kinsey; Anthony N Demaria; Nabil Dib; Karen L Christman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Skeletal myoblasts for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Shazia Durrani; Mikhail Konoplyannikov; Muhammad Ashraf; Khawaja Husnain Haider
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Optimized delivery system achieves enhanced endomyocardial stem cell retention.

Authors:  Atta Behfar; Jean-Pierre Latere; Jozef Bartunek; Christian Homsy; Dorothee Daro; Ruben J Crespo-Diaz; Paul G Stalboerger; Valerie Steenwinckel; Aymeric Seron; Margaret M Redfield; Andre Terzic
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.546

5.  Safety and efficacy of an injectable extracellular matrix hydrogel for treating myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sonya B Seif-Naraghi; Jennifer M Singelyn; Michael A Salvatore; Kent G Osborn; Jean J Wang; Unatti Sampat; Oi Ling Kwan; G Monet Strachan; Jonathan Wong; Pamela J Schup-Magoffin; Rebecca L Braden; Kendra Bartels; Jessica A DeQuach; Mark Preul; Adam M Kinsey; Anthony N DeMaria; Nabil Dib; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Injectable materials for the treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure: the promise of decellularized matrices.

Authors:  Jennifer M Singelyn; Karen L Christman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Non-surgical stem cell delivery strategies and in vivo cell tracking to injured myocardium.

Authors:  Tycho I G van der Spoel; Joe Chun-Tsu Lee; Krijn Vrijsen; Joost P G Sluijter; Maarten Jan M Cramer; Pieter A Doevendans; Eric van Belle; Steven A J Chamuleau
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Cell therapy for cardiovascular disease: a comparison of methods of delivery.

Authors:  Nabil Dib; Harris Khawaja; Samantha Varner; Megan McCarthy; Ann Campbell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials for cardiac regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Haotong Li; Minghui Bao; Yu Nie
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.