Literature DB >> 16458130

Randomized comparison of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high bolus dose tirofiban or abciximab on tissue-level perfusion and troponin release in high-risk acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: the EVEREST trial.

Leonardo Bolognese1, Giovanni Falsini, Francesco Liistro, Paolo Angioli, Kenneth Ducci, Tamara Taddei, Roberto Tarducci, Franco Cosmi, Silvia Baldassarre, Antonio Burali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban and abciximab on tissue level perfusion and troponin I release in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Optimal timing and dosage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for ACS remain to be explored.
METHODS: We randomized 93 high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI to receive upstream (in the coronary care unit) tirofiban, downstream (just prior to PCI) HDB tirofiban, and downstream abciximab. We evaluated the effects of the three drug regimens on tissue-level perfusion using the corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) before and immediately after PCI and after cardiac troponin I (cTnI).
RESULTS: The TMPG 0/1 perfusion was significantly less frequent with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban and abciximab both before (28.1% vs. 66.7% vs. 71%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and after PCI (6.2% vs. 20% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p = 0.015). Upstream tirofiban was also associated with a significantly higher MCE score index (0.88 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.32 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05). Post-procedural cTnI elevation was significantly less frequent among patients in the upstream tirofiban group compared with the HDB tirofiban and abciximab groups (9.4% vs. 30% vs. 38.7%, respectively; p = 0.018). The cTnI levels after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 7.2 +/- 12; p = 0.015) and abciximab (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 9 +/- 13.8; p = 0.0002)
CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk non-ST-segment-elevation ACS patients treated with an early invasive strategy, upstream tirofiban is associated with improved tissue-level perfusion and attenuated myocardial damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458130     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

1.  GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin.

Authors:  Michele Schiariti; Angela Saladini; Francesco Papalia; Placido Grillo; Cristina Nesta; Domenico Cuturello; Bindo Missiroli; Paolo Emilio Puddu
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-07-20

2.  Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Colin M Barker; Matthew J Price
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Routine upstream versus selective down stream use of tirofiban in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients scheduled for early invasive therapy; a randomized comparison.

Authors:  Saman Rasoul; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Menko Jan de Boer; Jan Henk E Dambrink; Harry Suryapranata; Jan C A Hoorntje; A T Marcel Gosselink; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Intracoronary versus intravenous high-dose bolus plus maintenance administration of tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Basar Candemir; Mustafa Kilickap; Ozgur Ulas Ozcan; Cansin Tulunay Kaya; Menekse Gerede; Aydan Ongun Ozdemir; Cagdas Ozdol; Deniz Kumbasar; Cetin Erol
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?

Authors:  Peter B Berger; Judson B Williams; Vic Hasselblad; Karen Chiswell; Karen S Pieper; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Benefit of standard versus low-dose tirofiban for percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Yun-ling Lin; Liang-long Chen; Yu-kun Luo; Xing-chun Zheng; Wei-wei Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Defining the role of platelet glycoprotein receptor inhibitors in STEMI: focus on tirofiban.

Authors:  Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Optimal management of platelet function after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Seung-Whan Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02

9.  Abciximab: a reappraisal of its use in coronary care.

Authors:  Marco Valgimigli; Gianluca Campo; Matteo Tebaldi; Roberto Carletti; Chiara Arcozzi; Roberto Ferrari; Gianfranco Percoco
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-03

10.  Bivalirudin plus loading dose of cilostazol-based triple-antiplatelet in treatment of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mei Wang; Guoru Zhang; Yaling Wang; Kun Zhou; Tao Liu; Yang Zhang; Anjun Guo; Yu An; Xiaodan Zhang; Yongjun Li
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.