Literature DB >> 16457842

Decoy models for protein structure comparison score normalisation.

William R Taylor1.   

Abstract

A method is described to construct sets of decoy models that can be used to generate a background score distribution for protein structure comparison. The models are derived directly from the two proteins being compared and retain all the essential properties of the structures, including length, density, shape and secondary structure composition but have different folds. As each comparison involves a pair of proteins of the same length, no explicit normalisation is required to adjust for the length of the proteins being compared. This allows substructure (or domain) matches to score almost equally to the comparison of isolated domains. A normalised probability measure was derived that allows joint family/family comparison. The method was applied to some of the CASP6 models for targets with new folds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16457842     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds.

Authors:  S M Hollup; E Fuglebakk; W R Taylor; N Reuter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Correspondences between low-energy modes in enzymes: dynamics-based alignment of enzymatic functional families.

Authors:  Andrea Zen; Vincenzo Carnevale; Arthur M Lesk; Cristian Micheletti
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations.

Authors:  Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Predicting transmembrane helix packing arrangements using residue contacts and a force-directed algorithm.

Authors:  Timothy Nugent; David T Jones
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Exploring the limits of fold discrimination by structural alignment: a large scale benchmark using decoys of known fold.

Authors:  Siv Midtun Hollup; Michael I Sadowski; Inge Jonassen; William R Taylor
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias.

Authors:  Thomas Hamelryck; John T Kent; Anders Krogh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  MICAN: a protein structure alignment algorithm that can handle Multiple-chains, Inverse alignments, C(α) only models, Alternative alignments, and Non-sequential alignments.

Authors:  Shintaro Minami; Kengo Sawada; George Chikenji
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A unified statistical model to support local sequence order independent similarity searching for ligand-binding sites and its application to genome-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Li Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Protein rethreading: A novel approach to protein design.

Authors:  Sayeh Agah; Sandra Poulos; Austin Yu; Iga Kucharska; Salem Faham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.