BACKGROUND: ZAP-70 has emerged as a potential pivotal prognostic marker for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which could replace immunoglobulin heavy chain mutation status. Although several flow cytometry assays have been described for assessing ZAP-70 in CLL, certain technical and scientific issues remain unsolved, which have prevented results of this crucial test from being reported, even in the best routine flow cytometry laboratories. In this report, we aimed to solve some of these issues by providing a computerized quantitative flow cytometric assay for ZAP-70 within the entire CLL population, which would be easy to perform and enable standardization between laboratories. METHODS: Intracellular ZAP-70 levels in CLL and normal B cells were assessed by molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF), employing Quantum FITC MESF calibration beads to establish a standard curve relating channel value to fluorescence intensity in MESF units and the QuickCal v. 2.2 program (www.bangslabs.com) and clinical relevance of the data was determined. RESULTS: The average ZAP-70 expression value in the CD19(+)/CD5(+) cells from 35 CLL patients was 103,701 MESF when compared with 12,621 MESF in B cells from 20 normal blood samples. "Low" and "high" ZAP-70 CLL subgroups were defined. Patients with "high ZAP-70 MESF" CLL had a shorter time to disease progression (P = 0.0005) and a more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.0018) when compared with patients in the "low ZAP-70 MESF" CLL subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This quantitative analysis method can be employed to obtain a more specific and highly accurate assessment of ZAP-70 levels in CLL cells. The method can easily be standardized, in any routine flow laboratory, thereby improving reproducibility and reliability of ZAP-70 analysis. (c) 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.
BACKGROUND:ZAP-70 has emerged as a potential pivotal prognostic marker for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which could replace immunoglobulin heavy chain mutation status. Although several flow cytometry assays have been described for assessing ZAP-70 in CLL, certain technical and scientific issues remain unsolved, which have prevented results of this crucial test from being reported, even in the best routine flow cytometry laboratories. In this report, we aimed to solve some of these issues by providing a computerized quantitative flow cytometric assay for ZAP-70 within the entire CLL population, which would be easy to perform and enable standardization between laboratories. METHODS: Intracellular ZAP-70 levels in CLL and normal B cells were assessed by molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF), employing Quantum FITC MESF calibration beads to establish a standard curve relating channel value to fluorescence intensity in MESF units and the QuickCal v. 2.2 program (www.bangslabs.com) and clinical relevance of the data was determined. RESULTS: The average ZAP-70 expression value in the CD19(+)/CD5(+) cells from 35 CLL patients was 103,701 MESF when compared with 12,621 MESF in B cells from 20 normal blood samples. "Low" and "high" ZAP-70 CLL subgroups were defined. Patients with "high ZAP-70 MESF" CLL had a shorter time to disease progression (P = 0.0005) and a more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.0018) when compared with patients in the "low ZAP-70 MESF" CLL subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This quantitative analysis method can be employed to obtain a more specific and highly accurate assessment of ZAP-70 levels in CLL cells. The method can easily be standardized, in any routine flow laboratory, thereby improving reproducibility and reliability of ZAP-70 analysis. (c) 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.
Authors: I Binsky-Ehrenreich; A Marom; M C Sobotta; L Shvidel; A Berrebi; I Hazan-Halevy; S Kay; A Aloshin; I Sagi; D M Goldenberg; L Leng; R Bucala; Y Herishanu; M Haran; I Shachar Journal: Oncogene Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Daniel W Sherbenou; Blake T Aftab; Yang Su; Christopher R Behrens; Arun Wiita; Aaron C Logan; Diego Acosta-Alvear; Byron C Hann; Peter Walter; Marc A Shuman; Xiaobo Wu; John P Atkinson; Jeffrey L Wolf; Thomas G Martin; Bin Liu Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Francesca M Rossi; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Davide Rossi; Maria Irno Consalvo; Fabrizio Luciano; Antonella Zucchetto; Pietro Bulian; Riccardo Bomben; Michele Dal Bo; Marco Fangazio; Dania Benedetti; Massimo Degan; Gianluca Gaidano; Giovanni Del Poeta; Valter Gattei Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Daniel W Sherbenou; Yang Su; Christopher R Behrens; Blake T Aftab; Olivia Perez de Acha; Megan Murnane; Shelby C Bearrows; Byron C Hann; Jeffery L Wolf; Thomas G Martin; Bin Liu Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marta de Almeida Santiago; Bruna de Paula Fonseca E Fonseca; Christiane de Fátima da Silva Marques; Edimilson Domingos da Silva; Alvaro Luiz Bertho; Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240