| Literature DB >> 16456772 |
Lorraine Ornelas1, Luis Padilla, Mauricio Di Silvio, Paul Schalch, Sandro Esperante, Paul López Infante, Juan Carlos Bustamante, Pablo Avalos, Deborah Varela, Manuel López.
Abstract
The search for better surgical repair of nerve injuries should be aimed at uncovering alternatives that not only are efficient, but also enhance nerve growth. The purpose of this study was to compare functional nerve responses following repair with either a traditional microsuture technique or Quixil human fibrin sealant. Thirty female Lewis rats received transection of the right sciatic nerve. Nerve repair was achieved with either epineurial microsuture (n = 15) or Quixil fibrin glue (n = 15). Functional results were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively with walking-track analysis. Electrophysiologic nerve recordings were also performed 12 weeks postoperatively. Rats receiving Quixil nerve repair returned to baseline performance on the walking-track analysis significantly faster than those with microsuture repairs (6 and 12 weeks postoperatively; p < 0.0001). Recovery of nerve conduction velocities and wave amplitudes was also significantly better in the nerves repaired with Quixil than in those repaired with microsuture (p's < 0.0001). Quixil human fibrin sealant is a good alternative to traditional microsuture nerve repair techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16456772 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-932506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reconstr Microsurg ISSN: 0743-684X Impact factor: 2.873