Literature DB >> 16456627

Governmental oversight of discharges from concentrated animal feeding operations.

Terence J Centner1.   

Abstract

As point sources of pollution in the United States, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are subject to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permitting system requirements. Changes to federal regulations in 2003 and a 2005 court decision have increased the governmental oversight of CAFOs. Manure application to fields from "large CAFOs" that results in unpermitted discharges can be regulated under the Clean Water Act. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's interpretation of agricultural stormwater discharges was approved so that unpermitted discharges may arise if an owner or operator of a CAFO fails to apply manure correctly. Owners and operators do not, however, have a duty to secure governmental permits in the absence of a discharge. Turning to the federal provisions regarding nutrient management plans, a court found that they were deficient. Moreover, the federal government needs to reconsider requirements that would reduce pathogens from entering surface waters. Although these developments should assist in reducing the impairment of U.S. waters, concern still exists. Greater oversight of nutrient management plans and enhanced enforcement efforts offer opportunities to provide greater assurance that CAFO owners and operators will not allow a discharge of pollutants to enter surface waters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16456627     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0130-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Agricultural phosphorus, water quality, and poultry production: are they compatible?

Authors:  A Sharpley
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Efficient use of animal manure on cropland--economic analysis.

Authors:  A A Araji; Z O Abdo; P Joyce
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 3.  Evolving policies to regulate pollution from animal feeding operations.

Authors:  T J Centner
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  New regulations to minimize water impairment from animals rely on management practices.

Authors:  Terence J Centner
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Potential health effects of odor from animal operations, wastewater treatment, and recycling of byproducts.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman; John M Walker; Pam Dalton; Tyler S Lorig; James H Raymer; Dennis Shusterman; C Mike Williams
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Shallow groundwater quality on dairy farms with irrigated forage crops.

Authors:  Thomas Harter; Harley Davis; Marsha C Mathews; Roland D Meyer
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Feasibility and costs of phosphorus application limits on 39 U.S. swine operations.

Authors:  John A Lory; Raymond E Massey; Joseph M Zulovich; John A Hoehne; Amy M Schmidt; Marcia S Carlson; Charles D Fulhage
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 8.  Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects.

Authors:  D Cole; L Todd; S Wing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Lessons from the flood: will Floyd change livestock farming?

Authors:  C W Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.