Literature DB >> 16455028

[Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail].

T Pavelka1, J Matejka, H Cervenková.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The article presents analysis of complications of the treatment of unstable fractures of the proximal femur by the proximal femoral nail (PFN Synthes). MATERIAL: Between October 1997 and October 2003, 239 patients were treated for unstable fractures of the proximal femur, 89 men and 150 women, average age 71 years. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Unstable was considered a fracture in which it was impossible to restore by reduction the medial support -- the Adams' arch, i. e. the region below the lesser trochanter in subtrochanteric fractures. Prevailing in the group of patients were unstable pertrochanteric fractures (AO 31 A2.1, A2.2) that occurred in 55 % of patients, per-subtrochanteric fractures (AO 31 A2.3) accounted only for 26 % and subtrochanteric fractures (AO 31 A3.3) for 19 %.
RESULTS: The fracture healed in 95 % of patients within 6 months and in 98 % of patients within 9 months. There were 29 intraoperative complications recorded in 19 patients (12 %). This category included also intraoperative technical difficulties. Only 9 patients (4 %) were reoperated on. Early postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (8 %) requiring reoperation in 7 cases. Six late postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. DISCUSSION: Intramedullary implants for internal fixation of the proximal femur tolerate higher static and several times higher cyclical loading as compared to DHS types of implant. As a result the fracture heals even without the primary restoration of the medial support. The implant temporarily compensates the function of the medial column. When this function is not restored in a limited period of time, the internal fixation, although correctly performed, fails. The main cause of complications are technical mistakes or failure to observe the proper surgical technique.
CONCLUSION: The most frequent mistake is reduction with the persisting varus position or distraction in the fracture line, incorrect placement of the screw in the femoral neck or the nail in the femoral shaft, wrong choice of the length of the screws, unnecessary hesitation in solving the defect in the course of the treatment. Forced insertion of the implant may cause additional damages to the skeleton. PFN is a quality implant for the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. The number and severity of complications may be reduced by the observance of proper principles of reduction and exact surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16455028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech        ISSN: 0001-5415            Impact factor:   0.531


  7 in total

1.  Proximal femoral nail - an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year.

Authors:  W M Gadegone; Y S Salphale
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Screw versus helical proximal femoral nail in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Col Narinder Kumar; Maj P K Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

3.  Tip-apex distance and other predictors of outcome in cephalomedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Bobby John; Anirudh Sharma; Anupam Mahajan; Ritesh Pandey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-29

4.  Outcomes of Geriatric Hip Fractures Treated with AFFIXUS Hip Fracture Nail.

Authors:  Ahmed Mabrouk; Mysore Madhusudan; Mohammed Waseem; Steven Kershaw; Jochen Fischer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2014-12-18

5.  Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for trochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Zhou Xiang; Pei-Yong Tan; Jing Yang; Dai-Qing Wei; Xi Yu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-19

6.  Similar function and complications for patients with short versus long hip nailing for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis P Galanopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Christos T Vottis; Evanthia Mitsiokapa; Panayiotis Koulouvaris; Dimitrios S Mastrokalos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Vasilios A Kontogeorgakos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-06-15

7.  Management of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures by Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Xiao-Hua Gu; Xi Li; Jian-Hong Wu; Yu-Feng Ju; Wei-Jie Huang; Qiu-Gen Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.