Literature DB >> 16455025

The benefits and limitations of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Farin Amersi1, Nora M Hansen.   

Abstract

The status of the axilla is the single most important prognostic indicator of overall survival in patients with breast cancer. Staging is based on tumor size and on the presence of lymph node metastases. The number of lymph nodes, although prognostic, no longer impacts treatment options. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and dissection is a more sensitive and accurate technique for nodal evaluation and has been applied to staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer, providing prognostic information, with less surgical morbidity than with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). When analyzed by an experienced pathologist with serial sectioning and immunohistochemical evaluation, SLN is the most accurate detection tool used in staging of breast cancer. In many centers that use these staging principles, ALND is no longer performed for histologically negative axillary SLNs. In addition, this technique may also be therapeutic because in most patients, the SLN is the only positive axillary node. SLN biopsy is justified in women with ductal carcinoma in situ who have a high risk of invasive carcinoma, such as those with large tumors, a mass, or high-grade lesions. SLN biopsy is performed in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and demonstrates accurate evaluation of the axilla in 90% of the cases. Women with locally advanced breast cancer may derive great benefit from a minimally invasive approach to the axilla because the extent of nodal involvement is unlikely to change further treatment. For clinically palpable nodes, ALND should be performed for therapeutic and local control. The use of sentinel node mapping in pregnancy is controversial. Vital blue dye is contraindicated in pregnant patients, although some have used radioactive colloid alone to map this subgroup of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16455025     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-006-0049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  70 in total

1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A pilot study.

Authors:  José Roberto M Piato; Alfredo Carlos S D Barros; Kátia M Pincerato; Ana Paula Q Sampaio; José Aristodemo Pinotti
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: a brief review.

Authors:  M Fernö
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  The impact of axillary lymphadenopathy on further treatment in breast cancer? A model for clinical staging.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Miltenburg; C Miller; T B Karamlou; F C Brunicardi
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes.

Authors:  U Veronesi; G Paganelli; V Galimberti; G Viale; S Zurrida; M Bedoni; A Costa; C de Cicco; J G Geraghty; A Luini; V Sacchini; P Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy results in less postoperative morbidity compared with axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

Authors:  William E Burak; Scott T Hollenbeck; Emmanuel E Zervos; Karen L Hock; Lisa C Kemp; Donn C Young
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  K M McMasters; S L Wong; T M Tuttle; D J Carlson; C M Brown; R Dirk Noyes; R L Glaser; D J Vennekotter; P S Turk; P S Tate; A Sardi; M J Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The sentinel node in breast cancer--a multicenter validation study.

Authors:  D Krag; D Weaver; T Ashikaga; F Moffat; V S Klimberg; C Shriver; S Feldman; R Kusminsky; M Gadd; J Kuhn; S Harlow; P Beitsch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  18 in total

1.  A further survey of surgical management of the axilla in UK breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ronan W Glynn; Linda Williams; J Michael Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines.

Authors:  John Buscombe; Giovanni Paganelli; Zeynep E Burak; Wendy Waddington; Jean Maublant; Enrique Prats; Holger Palmedo; Orazio Schillaci; Lorenzo Maffioli; M Lassmann; Carlo Chiesa; Emilio Bombardieri; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT with Contrast Enhancement for Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in T1 Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kong; Kyung Ah Chun; Ihn Ho Cho; Soo Jung Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

4.  In vivo quantitative evaluation of the transport kinetics of gold nanocages in a lymphatic system by noninvasive photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Xin Cai; Weiyang Li; Chul-Hong Kim; Yuchen Yuan; Lihong V Wang; Younan Xia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Multimodal sentinel lymph node mapping with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Walter J Akers; W Barry Edwards; Chulhong Kim; Baogang Xu; Todd N Erpelding; Lihong V Wang; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 7.012

6.  Noninvasive photoacoustic and fluorescence sentinel lymph node identification using dye-loaded perfluorocarbon nanoparticles.

Authors:  Walter J Akers; Chulhong Kim; Mikhail Berezin; Kevin Guo; Ralph Fuhrhop; Gregory M Lanza; Georg M Fischer; Ewald Daltrozzo; Andreas Zumbusch; Xin Cai; Lihong V Wang; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Stephanie Kurita; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Inference for constrained estimation of tumor size distributions.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Moulinath Banerjee; Pinaki Biswas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Naomi Alazraki; John N Aarsvold; Riccardo A Audisio; Edwin Glass; Sandra F Grant; Jolanta Kunikowska; Marjut Leidenius; Valeria M Moncayo; Roger F Uren; Wim J G Oyen; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Till A Heusner; Sherko Kuemmel; Steffen Hahn; Angela Koeninger; Friedrich Otterbach; Monia E Hamami; Klaus R Kimmig; Michael Forsting; Andreas Bockisch; Gerald Antoch; Alexander Stahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.