Literature DB >> 16454828

The case for direct colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

John H Bond.   

Abstract

Recent large series of direct colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer increase our understanding of the advantages of this approach, and have indirectly confirmed efficacy. When performed by well-trained, experienced endoscopists, colonoscopy screening is successful and safe. The prevalence of advanced neoplasia is low under the age of 50 yr but increases substantially with each decade of life thereafter at least until the age of 80 yr. Most detected cancers are at an early, curable stage. A substantial number of proximal advanced neoplasia are detected that would be missed by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Widespread population-based colonoscopy screening would markedly decrease the incidence and mortality of this major malignancy. Issues of compliance and capacity related to direct colonoscopy have not yet been adequately addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16454828     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation of colonoscopy use: implications for health education.

Authors:  Chia-Ching Chen; Charles E Basch; Tetsuji Yamada
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Colorectal cancer video for the deaf community: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Salma Shabaik; Sheila F LaHousse; Patricia Branz; Visha Gandhi; Amir M Khan; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Colonoscopy in the very elderly: a review of 157 cases.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; B Lauren Paton; Philip D Khan; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Frederick L Greene; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution as bowel preparations for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Qingsong Xie; Linghui Chen; Fengqing Zhao; Xiaohu Zhou; Pengfei Huang; Lufei Zhang; Dongkai Zhou; Jianfeng Wei; Weilin Wang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.