BACKGROUND: E5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli-challenged rats. RESULTS: All E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)--lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection.
BACKGROUND:E5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli-challenged rats. RESULTS: All E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)--lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection.
Authors: Elaine Liu; Kevin Lewis; Hiba Al-Saffar; Catherine M Krall; Anju Singh; Vladimir A Kulchitsky; Joshua J Corrigan; Christopher T Simons; Scott R Petersen; Florin M Musteata; Chandra S Bakshi; Andrej A Romanovsky; Timothy J Sellati; Alexandre A Steiner Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Junwu Su; Xizhong Cui; Yan Li; Haresh Mani; Gabriela A Ferreyra; Robert L Danner; Lewis L Hsu; Yvonne Fitz; Peter Q Eichacker Journal: J Trauma Date: 2010-06