Literature DB >> 16451240

Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.

Astrid J S F Visschers-Pleijers1, Diana H J M Dolmans, Bas A de Leng, Ineke H A P Wolfhagen, Cees P M van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Collaborative learning, including problem-based learning (PBL), is a powerful learning method. Group interaction plays a crucial role in stimulating student learning. However, few studies on learning processes in medical education have examined group interactions. Most studies on collaboration within PBL used self-reported data rather than observational data. We investigated the following types of interactions in PBL tutorial groups: learning-oriented interactions (exploratory questioning, cumulative reasoning and handling conflicts about knowledge); procedural interactions, and irrelevant/off-task interactions. AIM: The central question concerned how much time is spent on the different types of interaction during group sessions and how the types of interaction are distributed over the meeting.
METHOD: Four tutorial group sessions in Year 2 of the PBL undergraduate curriculum of Maastricht Medical School were videotaped and analysed. The sessions concerned the reporting phase of the PBL process. We analysed the interactions using a coding scheme distinguishing several verbal interaction types, such as questions, arguments and evaluations.
RESULTS: Learning-orientated interactions accounted for 80% of the interactions, with cumulative reasoning, exploratory questioning and handling conflicts about knowledge accounting for about 63%, 10% and 7% of the interactions, respectively. Exploratory questioning often preceded cumulative reasoning. Both types occurred throughout the meeting. Handling conflicts mainly occurred after the first 20 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Task involvement in the tutorial groups was high. All types of learning-orientated interactions were observed. Relatively little time was spent on exploratory questions and handling conflicts about knowledge. Problem-based learning training should pay special attention to stimulating discussion about contradictory information.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16451240     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02368.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  12 in total

1.  Is learning in problem-based learning cumulative?

Authors:  Elaine H J Yew; Esther Chng; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  The effect of midterm peer feedback on student functioning in problem-based tutorials.

Authors:  Rachelle J A Kamp; Diana H J M Dolmans; Henk J M Van Berkel; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Challenging students to formulate written questions: a randomized controlled trial to assess learning effects.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; A R T Rogier Donders; Jan G Kooloos; Rob Mw de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Enhancing students' learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking.

Authors:  Umatul Khoiriyah; Chris Roberts; Christine Jorm; C P M Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Uncovering students' misconceptions by assessment of their written questions.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; A R T Rogier Donders; Jan G Kooloos; Rob M W de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study.

Authors:  Anupama Sukhlecha; Shilpa P Jadav; Tushar R Gosai; Divakar Balusamy
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  Do medical students generate sound arguments during small group discussions in problem-based learning?: an analysis of preclinical medical students' argumentation according to a framework of hypothetico-deductive reasoning.

Authors:  Hyunjung Ju; Ikseon Choi; Bo Young Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2017-05-29

8.  Does PBL deliver constructive collaboration for students in interprofessional tutorial groups?

Authors:  Endang Lestari; Renée E Stalmeijer; Doni Widyandana; Albert Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Effectiveness of Collaborative Versus Traditional Teaching Methods in a Teaching Hospital in Gujarat.

Authors:  Kaushik K Lodhiya; Krutarth Ramanlal Brahmbhatt
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

10.  Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives.

Authors:  Maha Iqbal; Gary M Velan; Anthony J O'Sullivan; Chinthaka Balasooriya
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.