Literature DB >> 16450212

Imaging techniques contribute to increased surgical rescue of relapse in the follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Edurne Arriola1, Matilde Navarro, David Parés, Monica Muñoz, Laura Pareja, Joan Figueras, Gemma Soler, Mercedes Martinez, Margarita Majem, Jose R Germa-Lluch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzes the results of a follow-up policy in colorectal cancer at our institution and evaluates the possible benefit provided by each test performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred nineteen patients who had radical surgery and adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer were followed up with a protocol that included carcinoembryonic antigen testing and clinical examination every three months for the first two years, every four months in the third year, and every six months in the fourth and fifth years. Chest X-ray and colonoscopy were performed yearly for five years and abdominal ultrasound was done every six months for the first three years and yearly afterward. Abdominopelvic computerized tomography was performed yearly for the first two years in cases with rectal cancer. If relapse was detected, all operable cases underwent surgery if possible.
RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1999, 619 patients were followed-up. Mean follow-up was 66.9 months. Two hundred eight relapses were detected, 83.6 percent in the first three years and 73 (35.1 percent) underwent surgical resection. Carcinoembryonic antigen testing detected 44.2 percent of recurrences and 31.9 percent of them were operated on. Imaging techniques detected a lower percentage of recurrences (18.7 percent) but were more often resectable: 52 percent and 60 percent of the recurrences detected by computerized tomography and chest X-ray, respectively, underwent surgery. Median overall survival of patients with resected relapse was 62 months, significantly higher than those who were not operable (12.4 months).
CONCLUSION: Imaging techniques in the surveillance of resected colorectal cancer contribute to early detection of relapse with a high proportion of operable metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16450212     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0280-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  15 in total

1.  Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Adena Scheer; Rebecca Ann C Auer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

2.  Role of Ultrasonography in the Surveillance of Disease-Free Patients with Colorectal Cancer: a Retrospective Audit.

Authors:  Garima Suman; Akshay D Baheti; Suman Kumar Ankathi; Nitin Shetty; Suyash Kulkarni; Vikas Ostwal; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-04

3.  Postoperative surveillance recommendations for early stage colon cancer based on results from the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy trial.

Authors:  Vassiliki L Tsikitis; Kishore Malireddy; Erin A Green; Brent Christensen; Richard Whelan; Jace Hyder; Peter Marcello; Sergio Larach; David Lauter; Daniel J Sargent; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and PET-CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected local recurrence of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Fiocchi; V Iotti; G Ligabue; A Pecchi; G Luppi; B Bagni; F Rivasi; P Torricelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  [Importance of whole body MRI for staging of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  G Schmidt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Preoperative platelet count associates with survival and distant metastasis in surgically resected colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Shaogui Wan; Yinzhi Lai; Ronald E Myers; Bingshan Li; Terry Hyslop; Jack London; Devjani Chatterjee; Juan P Palazzo; Ashlie L Burkart; Kejin Zhang; Jinliang Xing; Hushan Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-09

7.  FDG-PET/MRI in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: first clinical experiences.

Authors:  Verena Plodeck; Nuh N Rahbari; Juergen Weitz; Christoph G Radosa; Michael Laniado; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Klaus Zöphel; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Joerg Kotzerke; Joerg van den Hoff; Ivan Platzek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Performance of integrated FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: Comparison with integrated FDG PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Masahiro Tsubaki; Masakatsu Sunagawa; Yasushi Kaji; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G P Schmidt; A Baur-Melnyk; A Haug; S Utzschneider; C R Becker; R Tiling; M F Reiser; K A Hermann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Bethany Shinkins; Indika Pathiraja; Nia W Roberts; Tim J James; Susan Mallett; Rafael Perera; John N Primrose; David Mant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.