Literature DB >> 16449730

Gender differences in outcomes after hospital discharge from coronary artery bypass grafting.

Veena Guru1, Stephen E Fremes, Peter C Austin, Eugene H Blackstone, Jack V Tu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative data regarding long-term nonfatal outcomes for women versus men after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study compares gender differences in cardiac events in a population of hospital survivors up to 11 years after isolated CABG surgery in Ontario, Canada. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A population-based cohort study (n=68,774 patients, 15,043 women) between September 1, 1991, and April 1, 2002, was assembled with linked clinical and administrative databases. Cox modeling and propensity score matching were used to compare death, cardiac readmission (angina, heart failure, myocardial infarction), repeat revascularization (angioplasty or CABG), and stroke readmission between men and women. Women were older (65+/-17 versus 62+/-13 years), more likely to present with urgent or emergent status (64% versus 56%), and less likely to receive arterial grafts (70% versus 78%). Women had a higher rate of cardiac readmission in the first year after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] of 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36 to 1.56), and this increased risk persisted after 1 year (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.31). This was primarily due to readmissions for unstable angina (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.38) and congestive heart failure (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21). Propensity-matched women had similar rates of death (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.98) and repeat revascularization (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Women have a more complex clinical preoperative presentation and are more likely to be readmitted with unstable angina and congestive heart failure after CABG but experience survival similar to those seen in men. Gender differences in outcomes may be improved through durable revascularization strategies and close postoperative follow-up care targeted to women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449730     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.576652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

1.  Sex in the CCU: women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome may do no worse despite less intervention.

Authors:  Pamela J Bradshaw; Peter L Thompson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Equal for whom? Addressing disparities in the Canadian medical system must become a national priority.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Field Synopsis of Sex in Clinical Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Jessica K Paulus; Benjamin S Wessler; Christine Lundquist; Lana L Y Lai; Gowri Raman; Jennifer S Lutz; David M Kent
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02

4.  Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Amit K Hiteshi; Dong Li; Yanlin Gao; Andy Chen; Ferdinand Flores; Song Shou Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Sex and mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Vito A Mannacio; Luigi Mannacio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Gender gap in acute coronary heart disease: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Mette Claassen; Kirsten C Sybrandy; Yolande E Appelman; Folkert W Asselbergs
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-26

7.  Impact of socio-economic status on the hospital readmission of Congestive Heart Failure patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Atefeh Noori; Mostafa Shokoohi; Mohammad Reza Baneshi; Nasim Naderi; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-09-30

8.  Predictors of early and late stroke following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Richard Whitlock; Jeff S Healey; Stuart J Connolly; Julie Wang; Matthew R Danter; Jack V Tu; Richard Novick; Stephen Fremes; Kevin Teoh; Vikas Khera; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Sex differences and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support implantation.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; JoAnn Lindenfeld; David P Kao
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Gender differences in utilization of effective cardiovascular secondary prevention: a Cleveland clinic prevention database study.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Byron Hoogwerf; Julie Huang; Danielle M Brennan; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.