Literature DB >> 16449686

What does the use of a computerized checklist mean for patient-centered care? The example of a routine diabetes review.

Penny Rhodes1, Mark Langdon, Emma Rowley, John Wright, Neil Small.   

Abstract

The authors examine the interaction between nurses and patients with type 2 diabetes during routine consultations in primary care settings in the United Kingdom. Through preconsultation interviews, the authors identified the patients' expectations. The article draws on videotaped consultations with 25 patients with type 2 diabetes. Using conversation analysis, the authors examine the use of a rigid agenda, imposed via a computerized checklist, and consider how far this is able to suppress the patient's agenda. They consider the potential impact for the patient and the factors that might encourage the clinician, and the nurse specifically, to adopt a narrowly task-based approach to the consultation. They identify two potentially conflicting strands within contemporary diabetes care, patient-centered practice and an emphasis on biomedical audit, and suggest that achievement of the former might be compromised by the demands of the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449686     DOI: 10.1177/1049732305282396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  10 in total

1.  A Longitudinal Study of Interactions Between Health Professionals and People With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes.

Authors:  Anthony Dowell; Maria Stubbe; Lindsay Macdonald; Rachel Tester; Lesley Gray; Sue Vernall; Tim Kenealy; Nicolette Sheridan; Barbara Docherty; Devi-Ann Hall; Deborah Raphael; Kevin Dew
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Review of electronic decision-support tools for diabetes care: a viable option for low- and middle-income countries?

Authors:  Mohammed K Ali; Seema Shah; Nikhil Tandon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  A question of quality? A single questionnaire for measuring asthma control, structuring asthma reviews, and monitoring health service standards.

Authors:  Hilary Pinnock; Helen Lester
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2012-06

4.  General practitioners uses and perceptions of voluntary electronic feedback on treatment outcomes - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria Laura Lippert; Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Lars Bjerrum
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  A computer template to enhance patient-centredness in multimorbidity reviews: a qualitative evaluation in primary care.

Authors:  Cindy Mann; Alison Shaw; Lesley Wye; Chris Salisbury; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients' unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Julia Frost; Andy Gibson; Obioha Ukoumunne; Bijay Vaidya; Nicky Britten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Computer templates in chronic disease management: ethnographic case study in general practice.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh; Celia Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The electronic medical record and Patient-centered care.

Authors:  Neil J Nusbaum
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-11-07

9.  Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Ian S Watt
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 10.  Effectiveness and perceptions of using templates in long-term condition reviews: a systematic synthesis of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mary Morrissey; Elizabeth Shepherd; Emma Kinley; Kirstie McClatchey; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.302

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.