Thomas Drivsholm1, Niels de Fine Olivarius. 1. The Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. thomas.drivsholm@gpract.ku.dk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuity of care may not only save time and money for the health care system, but may also be beneficial for the individual patient. How well GPs know their patients may potentially lead to an early diagnosis of a slowly progressive chronic disease like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this paper is to investigate this hypothesis. METHODS: A cross-sectional, population-based study of 1136 patients newly diagnosed with T2DM by their GP. Our main outcomes were how well the GPs' knew their patients (questionnaire) and centralized analysis of glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c). Multivariate linear regression models were used to allow adjustment for confounding variables. RESULTS: GPs classified how well they knew their patients as being not well for 13.5% (153/1136) of their patients, as fairly well for 38.6% (438/1136) and as very well for 48.0% (545/1136). Patients whom the GPs classified as not knowing well had relatively high glycaemic levels compared with levels among other patients, a finding that was confirmed in multivariate linear regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the glycaemic level among patients whom the GP characterize as knowing well or fairly well is relatively low compared with among patients whom the GP characterize as not knowing well. We suggest that this reflects a late diagnosis in these patients, and that GPs should be especially aware of undiagnosed T2DM among patients whom they do not know well.
BACKGROUND: Continuity of care may not only save time and money for the health care system, but may also be beneficial for the individual patient. How well GPs know their patients may potentially lead to an early diagnosis of a slowly progressive chronic disease like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this paper is to investigate this hypothesis. METHODS: A cross-sectional, population-based study of 1136 patients newly diagnosed with T2DM by their GP. Our main outcomes were how well the GPs' knew their patients (questionnaire) and centralized analysis of glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c). Multivariate linear regression models were used to allow adjustment for confounding variables. RESULTS: GPs classified how well they knew their patients as being not well for 13.5% (153/1136) of their patients, as fairly well for 38.6% (438/1136) and as very well for 48.0% (545/1136). Patients whom the GPs classified as not knowing well had relatively high glycaemic levels compared with levels among other patients, a finding that was confirmed in multivariate linear regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the glycaemic level among patients whom the GP characterize as knowing well or fairly well is relatively low compared with among patients whom the GP characterize as not knowing well. We suggest that this reflects a late diagnosis in these patients, and that GPs should be especially aware of undiagnosed T2DM among patients whom they do not know well.
Authors: Suan Ee Ong; Joel Jun Kai Koh; Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh; Kee Seng Chia; Dina Balabanova; Martin McKee; Pablo Perel; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240