| Literature DB >> 16449208 |
Srinivasa Rao Meneni1, Rhijuta D'Mello, Gregory Norigian, Gregory Baker, Lan Gao, M Paul Chiarelli, Bongsup P Cho.
Abstract
Circular dichroism (CD) and UV-melting experiments were conducted with 16 oligodeoxynucleotides modified by the carcinogen 2-aminofluorene, whose sequence around the lesion was varied systematically [d(CTTCTNG[AF]NCCTC), N = G, A, C, T], to gain insight into the factors that determine the equilibrium between base-displaced stacked (S) and external B-type (B) duplex conformers. Differing stabilities among the duplexes can be attributed to different populations of S and B conformers. The AF modification always resulted in sequence-dependent thermal (T(m)) and thermodynamic (-DeltaG degrees ) destabilization. The population of B-type conformers derived from eight selected duplexes (i.e. -AG*N- and -CG*N-) was inversely proportional to the -DeltaG degrees and T(m) values, which highlights the importance of carcinogen/base stacking in duplex stabilization even in the face of disrupted Watson-Crick base pairing in S-conformation. CD studies showed that the extent of the adduct-induced negative ellipticities in the 290-350 nm range is correlated linearly with -DeltaG degrees and T(m), but inversely with the population of B-type conformations. Taken together, these results revealed a unique interplay between the extent of carcinogenic interaction with neighboring base pairs and the thermodynamic properties of the AF-modified duplexes. The sequence-dependent S/B heterogeneities have important implications in understanding how arylamine-DNA adducts are recognized in nucleotide excision repair.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16449208 PMCID: PMC1356535 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1(A) Chemical structures of AF-adduct (N-[deoxyguanosin-8-yl]-2-aminofluorene) and AAF-adduct (N-[deoxyguanosin-8-yl]-2-acetylaminofluorene). (B) Two prototype AF-induced conformations: an external binding B-type (B) conformer and a base-displaced stacked (S) conformer. The hydrophobic AF moiety is shown in CPK. The modified dG in the B-conformer maintains a Watson–Crick base pairing with the AF moiety protruding in the major groove, whereas the S-conformer adopts a base-displacement structure with the AF ring inserted into the helix. The duplex structures of sequence 5 were constructed with the literature protocols (16) and shown here for illustration purpose only.
The effects of AF modification on the thermal and thermodynamic stability of DNA duplexes 5′-CTTCTNG*NCCTC-3′G* = AF-adduct; N = dG, dA, dT, dC 3′-GAAGANC NGGAG-5′
| Number | Sequence | −Δ | −Δ | ΔΔ | ΔΔ | Δ | CD−/+ | % S-conformer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.7 (13.7) | 81.1 (95.4) | 54.0 (62.3) | 3.0 | 14.2 | −8.3 | 0.24 | ||
| 2 | 9.4 (13.0) | 74.4 (97.1) | 49.4 (59.1) | 3.6 | 22.8 | −9.7 | 0.33 | ||
| 3 | 9.9 (13.6) | 68.3 (90.9) | 52.8 (63.2) | 3.7 | 22.6 | −10.4 | 0.24 | ||
| 4 | 9.3 (12.0) | 73.2 (86.4) | 49.2 (56.3) | 2.7 | 13.2 | −7.2 | 0.58 | ||
| 5 | 9.9 (12.7) | 84.5 (101.0) | 49.9 (56.2) | 2.8 | 16.5 | −6.3 | 0.24 | 32 | |
| 6 | 8.8 (11.1) | 79.7 (87.8) | 46.1 (54.2) | 2.3 | 8.1 | −8.2 | 0.28 | 39 | |
| 7 | 8.4 (11.0) | 67.8 (74.4) | 45.9 (56.6) | 2.6 | 6.6 | −10.7 | 0.35 | 60 | |
| 8 | 8.1 (10.2) | 66.5 (76.8) | 44.3 (52.8) | 2.1 | 10.3 | −8.5 | 0.44 | 64 | |
| 9 | 10.7 (13.5) | 80.4 (87.8) | 52.6 (63.5) | 2.8 | 7.4 | −10.9 | 0.12 | 36 | |
| 10 | 9.1 (11.7) | 68.0 (77.7) | 49.0 (59.8) | 2.6 | 9.7 | −10.8 | 0.19 | 44 | |
| 11 | 9.6 (12.7) | 70.4 (74.2) | 51.2 (64.4) | 3.1 | 3.8 | −13.2 | 0.23 | 47 | |
| 12 | 8.8 (11.7) | 71.6 (76.0) | 47.5 (59.6) | 2.9 | 4.4 | −12.1 | 0.25 | 63 | |
| 13 | 7.3 (10.4) | 63.7 (75.4) | 41.9 (53.6) | 3.1 | 11.7 | −11.7 | 0.58 | ||
| 14 | 8.8 (11.5) | 70.7 (89.6) | 47.2 (55.8) | 2.7 | 18.9 | −8.6 | 0.41 | ||
| 15 | 8.9 (11.7) | 69.5 (72.2) | 49.0 (59.8) | 2.8 | 2.7 | −10.8 | 0.38 | ||
| 16 | 6.8 (7.9) | 47.0 (61.9) | 39.1 (43.9) | 1.1 | 14.9 | −4.8 | 0.56 |
aThe central trimer portion of the 12mer duplex (G* = AF-adduct, Figure 1).
bThe results of curve fit and Tm − lnCt dependence were within ±15% of each other and therefore these numbers are average of the two methods. The average SDs for −ΔG° and −ΔH° are ±0.22 and ±6.33, respectively.
cTm values at 14 µM taken from the 1/Tm− lnCt/4 Meltwin plots.
dΔΔG = ΔG° (AF-modified duplex) − ΔG° (control duplex).
eΔΔH = ΔH° (AF-modified duplex) − ΔH° (control duplex).
fΔTm= Tm (AF-modified duplex) − Tm (control duplex).
gRatio of the negative over the positive areas in the 250–360 nm region (Figure 3C).
hPercent S-conformer population determined by 19F NMR measurements of duplexes 5–12 modified by the fluorine reporter probe ‘7-fluoro-2-aminfluorene’ (Results).
iData in parentheses are from unmodified control duplexes.
Figure 2CD spectral overlays of sequence 5 at 15°C; single-stranded AF-modified sequence (dotted line), unmodified duplex (dashed line), and AF-modified duplex (solid line).
Figure 3CD spectral overlays of AF-modified duplexes in the 290–365 nm region at 15°C for (A) ‘S-curved’ and (B) ‘bucket-shaped’ sequences. (C) Calculation of CD−/+ (Results).
Figure 4Correlations of % B-conformation with (A) −ΔG°, (B) Tm and (C) CD−/+ for eight selected AF-modified duplexes (sequences 5–12).