Literature DB >> 16449122

Universal perinatal depression screening in an Academic Medical Center.

Trent E J Gordon1, Ida A Cardone, Jennifer J Kim, Scott M Gordon, Richard K Silver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a department-based program to identify and treat women at risk for perinatal depression.
METHODS: Private and employed physician groups were engaged to conduct antepartum maternal depression screening using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A comprehensive program was established to ensure that patients identified as being at risk would receive appropriate care. The program 1) developed a network of existing community mental health providers to accommodate screen-positive referrals, 2) created a 24/7 hotline staffed by mental health workers to respond to urgent/emergent patient needs, 3) provided nursing and physician education via a comprehensive curriculum on perinatal depression, and 4) facilitated outpatient depression screening that included a centralized scoring and referral system.
RESULTS: A total of 4,322 women completed 4,558 screens during the initial 24 months (June 2003-May 2005). Although initial uptake of the screening program was gradual, all 20 departmental obstetric practices were screening their patients at the end of the first year. Depression screening was accomplished between 28-32 weeks of gestation, and postpartum screening (during the 6-week postpartum visit) was subsequently added. Overall, 11.1% of women screened positive in the antenatal period, and 7.3% screened positive in the postnatal period. Three hundred three women were referred for evaluation and care.
CONCLUSION: Department-based, perinatal depression screening was feasible when individual physician practices were not required to develop the infrastructure necessary to respond to at-risk patients. We believe that the provision of clinical safety nets (mental health provider network and the hotline) were essential to the universal acceptance of this program by practitioners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449122     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194080.18261.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Addressing the Missing Part of Evidence-based Practice: The Importance of Respecting Clinical Judgment in the Process of Adopting a New Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Vered Ben-David; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Ron Tompkins
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.835

2.  Disseminating perinatal depression screening as a public health initiative: a train-the-trainer approach.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Rebecca L Brock; Michael W O'Hara; Laura L Gorman; Jane Engeldinger
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

3.  Poor prepregnancy and antepartum mental health predicts postpartum mental health problems among US women: a nationally representative population-based study.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; John M Hampton; Paul D Creswell; Erika W Hagen; Hilary A Spear; Torsheika Maddox; Thomas Deleire
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-02-24

4.  Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: impact of trimester and parity.

Authors:  Shuang Ji; Qi Long; D Jeffrey Newport; Hyeji Na; Bettina Knight; Elizabeth B Zach; Natalie J Morris; Michael Kutner; Zachary N Stowe
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Perinatal depression screening in healthy start: an evaluation of the acceptability of technical assistance consultation.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Michael W O'Hara; Sheehan D Fisher
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-03-27

Review 6.  Perinatal depression: a review of US legislation and law.

Authors:  Ann M Rhodes; Lisa S Segre
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  A model for maternal depression.

Authors:  Cynthia D Connelly; Mary J Baker-Ericzen; Andrea L Hazen; John Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Does additional prenatal care in the home improve birth outcomes for women with a prior preterm delivery? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Melanie Lutenbacher; Patricia Temple Gabbe; Sharon M Karp; Mary S Dietrich; Deborah Narrigan; Lavenia Carpenter; William Walsh
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

9.  Exposure to maternal pre- and postnatal depression and anxiety symptoms: risk for major depression, anxiety disorders, and conduct disorder in adolescent offspring.

Authors:  Cristie Glasheen; Gale A Richardson; Kevin H Kim; Cynthia A Larkby; Holly A Swartz; Nancy L Day
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2013-11

10.  Distinct trajectories of perinatal depressive symptomatology: evidence from growth mixture modeling.

Authors:  Pablo A Mora; Ian M Bennett; Irma T Elo; Leny Mathew; James C Coyne; Jennifer F Culhane
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.