Literature DB >> 16449105

Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.

Elisabeth Peregrine1, Patrick O'Brien, Rumana Omar, Eric Jauniaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether factors in the maternal history and/or ultrasound parameters are useful in predicting the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
METHODS: Maternal age, height, body mass index, parity, gestational age, Bishop score, ultrasonic amniotic fluid volume, fetal head position, estimated fetal weight, and transvaginal cervical length were studied prospectively in 267 women at 36 or more weeks of gestation immediately before induction of labor. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors best predicted the risk of cesarean delivery. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a resampling technique were used to evaluate the model's performance.
RESULTS: Eighty (30%) of these 267 women had cesarean delivery. Logistic regression was performed and a final model chosen, which included parity (odds ratio [OR] 20.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.97-53.05, P < .001), body mass index (OR 6.17, 95% CI 2.10-18.13, P < .001), height (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P = .005), and ultrasonic transvaginal cervical length (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.11, P < .001) as the best predictors of cesarean delivery. A risk score was calculated containing these 4 parameters, which predicted reasonably accurately the risk of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: Parity, body mass index, height, and ultrasonic transvaginal cervical length are the most accurate parameters in predicting the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. A predictive model using these would allow more accurate counseling and better informed consent in the decision-making process regarding induction of labor LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449105     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196508.11431.c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction.

Authors:  Neha Bajpai; Rajesh Bhakta; Pratap Kumar; Lavanya Rai; Shripad Hebbar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

3.  Evaluation of risk factors in cesarean delivery among multiparous women with a history of vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Aysel Uysal Derbent; Aysun Karabulut; Melahat Yıldırım; Serap Aynur Simavlı; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Elizabeth W Triche; David D Dore; Janet H Muri; Maureen G Phipps; David A Savitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor.

Authors:  Parvin Bastani; Kobra Hamdi; Fatemeh Abasalizadeh; Parisa Pourmousa; Fatemeh Ghatrehsamani
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-12

6.  "Early rupture of membranes" during induced labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas.

Authors:  Seung Mi Lee; Jeong Woo Park; Chan-Wook Park; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sonographically accessed funneling of the uterine cervix as a predictor of successful labor induction.

Authors:  Seon Hwa Chung; Mi Kyung Kong; Eui Hyeok Kim; Sang Won Han
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soghra Khazardoost; Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani; Sahar Latifi; Sedighe Borna; Maryam Tahani; Mohammad Ali Rezaei; Masoomeh Shafaat
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Maternal height and risk of caesarean section in singleton births in Sweden-A population-based study using data from the Swedish Pregnancy Register 2011 to 2016.

Authors:  Ingrid Mogren; Maria Lindqvist; Kerstin Petersson; Carin Nilses; Rhonda Small; Gabriel Granåsen; Kristina Edvardsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries.

Authors:  Hayala C C de Souza; Gleici S C Perdoná; Alessandra C Marcolin; Lawal O Oyeneyin; Olufemi T Oladapo; Kidza Mugerwa; João Paulo Souza
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.