Literature DB >> 1644829

Gastric procathepsin E and progastricsin from guinea pig. Purification, molecular cloning of cDNAs, and characterization of enzymatic properties, with special reference to procathepsin E.

T Kageyama1, M Ichinose, S Tsukada, K Miki, K Kurokawa, O Koiwai, M Tanji, E Yakabe, S B Athauda, K Takahashi.   

Abstract

Procathepsin E and progastricsin were purified from the gastric mucosa of the guinea pig. They were converted to the active form autocatalytically under acidic conditions. Each active form hydrolyzed protein substrates maximally at around pH 2.5. Pepstatin inhibited cathepsin E very strongly at an equimolar concentration, whereas the inhibition was much weaker for gastricsin. Molecular cloning of the respective cDNAs permitted us to deduce the complete amino acid sequences of their pre-proforms; preprocathepsin E and preprogastricsin consisted of 391 and 394 residues, respectively. Procathepsin E has unique structural and enzymatic features among the aspartic proteinases. Lys at position 37, which is common to various aspartic proteinases and is thought to be important for stabilizing the activation segment, was absent at the corresponding position, as in human procathepsin E. The rate of activation of procathepsin E to cathepsin E is maximal at around pH 4.0. It is very different from the pepsinogens and may be correlated with the absence of Lys37. Native procathepsin E is a dimer, consisting of two monomers covalently bound by a disulfide bridge between 2 Cys37. Interconversion between the dimer and the monomer was reversible and regulated by low concentrations of a reducing reagent. Although the properties of the dimeric and monomeric cathepsins E are quite similar, a marked difference was found between them in terms of their stability in weakly alkaline solution: monomeric cathepsin E was unstable at weakly alkaline pH whereas the dimeric form was stable. The generation of the monomer was thought to be the process leading to inactivation, hence degradation of cathepsin E in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1644829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  6 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes.

Authors:  A R Khan; M N James
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Purification and molecular cloning of aspartic proteinases from the stomach of adult Japanese fire belly newts, Cynops pyrrhogaster.

Authors:  Tatsuki Nagasawa; Kaori Sano; Mari Kawaguchi; Ken-Ichiro Kobayashi; Shigeki Yasumasu; Tomofumi Inokuchi
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 3.  Mechanism of activation of the gastric aspartic proteinases: pepsinogen, progastricsin and prochymosin.

Authors:  C Richter; T Tanaka; R Y Yada
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Regulatory mechanism of pepsinogen gene expression in monolayer cultured guinea pig gastric chief cells.

Authors:  N Okayama; M Itoh; T Joh; T Miyamoto; T Takeuchi; A Moriyama; T Kato
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Structure and function studies on enzymes with a catalytic carboxyl group(s): from ribonuclease T1 to carboxyl peptidases.

Authors:  Kenji Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.493

6.  A structural biology approach to understand human lymphatic filarial infection.

Authors:  Raghavendra Sashi Krishna Nagampalli; Krishnasamy Gunasekaran; Rangarajan Badri Narayanan; Angela Peters; Rajagopalan Bhaskaran
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-02-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.