Literature DB >> 16448279

Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial.

Antonia M Burgess1, Martin Sherriff, Anthony J Ireland.   

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical trial was to determine whether pumice prophylaxis is required before the use of a self-etching primer (SEP). A total of 30 patients undergoing treatment with full upper and lower fixed appliances were recruited into this randomized cross-mouth controlled trial. In all cases, stainless steel orthodontic brackets were bonded using Transbondtrade mark XT adhesive after pretreatment of the enamel surface using a new SEP. Diagonally opposite quadrants of the mouth were randomly assigned to have the enamel either pumiced or not pumiced before the use of a SEP. Bond failures, along with the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores, were recorded at 6 and 12 months into treatment. The data were subsequently analyzed in terms of odds ratio and associated 95% confidence interval. Because of the very high bond failure rates of 55.5% for the no-pumice group and 33.2% for the pumice group, patient recruitment ceased at only 14 patients. Although the bond failure rates were unacceptably high in both groups, pumicing was found to have a clinically and statistically significant effect on reducing clinical bond failure rates. The ARI scores in all cases were 0, indicating that no adhesive remained on the enamel surface at bond failure. The significance of this trial is that pumicing before the use of an SEP is to be recommended, although the SEP used in this study cannot be recommended for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16448279     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0114:SPIPPN]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the failure rates of metallic brackets.

Authors:  Fábio Lourenço Romano; Américo Bortolazzo Correr; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Maria Beatriz Borges de Araújo Magnani; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Comparative Study of the Effect of Acid Etching on Enamel Surface Roughness between Pumiced and Non-pumiced Teeth.

Authors:  Lucas Guimarães Abreu; Saul Martins Paiva; Henrique Pretti; Elizabeth Maria Bastos Lages; João Batista Novães Júnior; Ricardo Alberto Neto Ferreira
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

3.  Analysis of Enamel Loss by Prophylaxis and Etching Treatment in Human Tooth Using Optical Coherence Tomography: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar Ravichandran; Hemanth Tumkur Lakshmikantha; Hyo-Sang Park; Mansik Jeon; Jeehyun Kim
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Characteristics of adhesive bonding with enamel deproteinization.

Authors:  Ghada Abdelaziz Mahmoud; Mohammed E Grawish; Marwa Sameh Shamaa; Yasser Lotfy Abdelnaby
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

5.  Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer.

Authors:  Mete Ozer; Mehmet Bayram; Cagri Dincyurek; Fuat Tokalak
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets without enamel etching.

Authors:  Alireza Boruziniat; Yegane Khazaei; Shiva Motaghi; Mohmmadjavad Moghaddas
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Effect of Enamel Pretreatment with Pastes Presenting Different Relative Dentin Abrasivity (RDA) Values on Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Efficacy of Microfilled Composite Resin: In Vitro Investigation and Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Maurizio Pascadopoli; Simone Gallo; Federico Ricaldone; Davide Dirk Kramp; Margherita Valla; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.